Dimensional error of selective laser sintering, three-dimensional printing and PolyJet™ models in the reproduction of mandibular anatomy

被引:197
作者
Ibrahim, Danilo [1 ]
Broilo, Tiago Leonardo [1 ]
Heitz, Claiton [1 ]
de Oliveira, Marilia Gerhardt [1 ]
de Oliveira, Helena Willhelm [1 ]
Wanderlei Nobre, Stella Maris [1 ]
Dos Santos Filho, Jose Henrique Gomes [1 ]
Silva, Daniela Nascimento [1 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Fac Odontol, Sch Dent, BR-90619900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
mandible; oral surgery; maxillofacial surgery; craniofacial abnormalities; skeleton; Helical Computed Tomography; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ACCURACY; STEREOLITHOGRAPHY; LIMITATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcms.2008.10.008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: Selective laser sintering (SLS), three-dimensional printing (3DP (TM)) and PolyJet (TM) are rapid prototyping (RP) techniques to fabricate prototypes from virtual biomedical images. To be used in maxillofacial surgery, these models must accurately reproduce the craniofacial skeleton. Purpose: To analyze the capacity of SLS, 3DP (TM) and PolyJet (TM) models to reproduce mandibular anatomy and their dimensional error. Material: Dry mandible, helical CT images, SLS, 3DP (TM) and PolyJet (TM) prototypes, and digital electronic caliper. Methods: Helical CT images were acquired from a dry mandible (criterion standard) and manipulated with the InVesalius software. Prototypes were produced using SLS, 3DP (TM) and PolyJet (TM) techniques. Thirteen linear measurements of each prototype were made and compared with the dry mandible measurements. Results: The results showed a dimensional error of 1.79%, 3.14% and 2.14% for SLS, 3DP (TM) and PolyJet (TM) models, respectively. The models satisfactorily reproduced anatomic details and the SLS and PolyJet (TM) prototypes showed greater dimensional precision and reproduced mandibular anatomy more accurately than the 3DP (TM) model. Conclusions: The SLS prototype had a greater dimensional accuracy than the PolyJet (TM) and 3DP (TM) models. The PolyJet (TM) technique reproduced anatomic details of the mandible more accurately. (C) 2008 European Association for Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 173
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] *ARTIS, 2006, PROT RAP
  • [2] Comparison of three-dimensional computed tomography with rapid prototype models in the management of coronoid hyperplasia
    Asaumi, J
    Kawai, N
    Honda, Y
    Shigehara, H
    Wakasa, T
    Kishi, K
    [J]. DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 30 (06) : 330 - 335
  • [3] ASHLEY S, 1991, MECH ENG, V113, P34
  • [4] Barker T M, 1994, Australas Radiol, V38, P106, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1994.tb00146.x
  • [5] Preliminary experience with medical applications of rapid prototyping by selective laser sintering
    Berry, E
    Brown, JM
    Connell, M
    Craven, CM
    Efford, ND
    Radjenovic, A
    Smith, MA
    [J]. MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 1997, 19 (01) : 90 - 96
  • [6] STEREOLITHOGRAPHY IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL OPERATION PLANNING
    BILL, JS
    REUTHER, JF
    DITTMANN, W
    KUBLER, N
    MEIER, JL
    PISTNER, H
    WITTENBERG, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1995, 24 (01) : 98 - 103
  • [7] Bushong S., 1997, Radiologic Science for Technologists
  • [8] The accuracy of stereolithography in planning craniofacial bone replacement
    Chang, PSH
    Parker, TH
    Patrick, CW
    Miller, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2003, 14 (02) : 164 - 170
  • [9] Cranioplasty using acrylic material: a new technical procedure
    Chiarini, L
    Figurelli, S
    Pollastri, G
    Torcia, E
    Ferrari, F
    Albanese, M
    Nocini, PF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 32 (01) : 5 - 9
  • [10] Analysis of errors in medical rapid prototyping models
    Choi, JY
    Choi, JH
    Kim, NK
    Kim, Y
    Lee, JK
    Kim, MK
    Lee, JH
    Kim, MJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 31 (01) : 23 - 32