Factor structure of the Comprehensive Adolescent Severity Inventory (CASI): Results of reliability, validity, and generalizability analyses

被引:17
作者
Meyers, Kathleen [1 ]
Hagan, Teresa A.
McDermott, Paul
Webb, Alicia
Randall, Mary
Frantz, Jeanne
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat, Ctr Treatment & Evaluat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[3] Syst Measures Inc, Spring Mt, PA USA
[4] Grad Sch Educ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Temple Univ, Grad Sch Psychol, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
adolescent assessment; adolescent substance abuse; instrument development; substance abuse assessment;
D O I
10.1080/00952990500479464
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article describes the results of psychometric work conducted on the Comprehensive Adolescent Severity Inventory (CASI) among 205 in-treatment substance-abusing adolescents. Four dimensions, each composed of component subscales, resulted from standard psychometric analyses: Chemical Dependency, Psychosocial Functioning, Delinquency, and Risk Behavior. Each dimension had high internal consistency (alpha coefficients for the component subscales comprising each clinical dimension range from .78 to .96) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients range from .88 to .96 and all are significant at p < .0001.). Concurrent validity and specificity of the CASI dimensions also were found: significant and substantial variance in NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Revised (DISC-IV) and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) scores was associated with relevant CASI dimensions; CASI dimensions that theoretically should show no significant relationship with divergent pathology were not associated. The dimensions forecasted substantial variance in adolescent functioning posttreatment discharge, supporting predictive validity. Finally, the dimensional clinical structure was found to be generalizable over male and female adolescents, younger and older adolescents, and adolescents from different ethnic groups. These results provide further evidence for the CASI's promise in research and practice as an adolescent-specific assessment instrument that comprehensively assesses multidimensional areas of functioning within a developmental context of measurement. Limitations of the study along with future work currently being conducted on the CASI are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 310
页数:24
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Anderberg M.R., 1973, Probability and Mathematical Statistics
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Applied psychometrics
[3]   AGE-OF-ONSET IN SCHIZOPHRENIA AND SCHIZOTYPAL DISORDERS - CLINICAL AND GENETIC-IMPLICATIONS [J].
BARON, M ;
GRUEN, R ;
ASNIS, L ;
KANE, J .
NEUROPSYCHOBIOLOGY, 1983, 10 (04) :199-204
[4]  
Baumrind D, 1985, Adv Alcohol Subst Abuse, V4, P41
[5]  
BAUMRIND D, 1995, J CHILD ADOLES SUBST, V4, P49
[6]   FACTORING ITEMS AND FACTORING SCALES ARE DIFFERENT - SPURIOUS EVIDENCE FOR MULTIDIMENSIONALITY DUE TO ITEM CATEGORIZATION [J].
BERNSTEIN, IH ;
TENG, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 105 (03) :467-477
[7]  
Blake SM., 1992, Psychol Health, V6, P265
[8]  
BOTVIN GJ, 1992, J DEV BEHAV PEDIATR, V13, P290
[9]   REMARKS ON PARALLEL ANALYSIS [J].
BUJA, A ;
EYUBOGLU, N .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1992, 27 (04) :509-540
[10]  
BUYDENSBRANCHEY L, 1989, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V46, P225