Analysis of Classical and Quantum Resources for the Quantum Linear Systems Algorithm

被引:0
作者
Inouye, Jon [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanbridge Coll, Sch Informat Technol, Irvine, CA 92612 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2013 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: NEW GENERATIONS | 2013年
关键词
quantum computing; quantum linear algorithm; quantum phase estimation; quantum gate; fault-tolerant quantum computing; quantum information systems;
D O I
10.1109/ITNG.2013.117
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The quantum algorithm by Harrow, Hassidim, and Lloyd solves a system of N linear equations and achieves exponential speedup over classical algorithms under certain conditions. The advantage to the algorithm is that log(N) rather than N registers are required. Given an N x N matrix A and vectors x and b, the quantum algorithm seeks to find x such that Ax = b. By representing vector b as a superposition of quantum states vertical bar b>, quantum phase estimation is used to find the corresponding eigenvalues of A. Applying the inverse Fourier transform, we solve for vertical bar x> such that vertical bar x> = A(-1)vertical bar b>. We model the algorithm using a quantum circuit diagram, with data qubits encoded using the Steane code for fault tolerant quantum phase estimation. Fresh ancilla for error correction are provided using an oracular pipelined ancilla architecture. We then analyze the classical and quantum resources needed for implementation. The significance of this case study is to examine how classical and quantum resources interact in implementing this algorithm. The issues raised in this analysis, such as fault tolerant phase estimation using pipelined ancilla, garbage collection, and the preparation of I/O registers to this architecture, will be explored in more detail in future research.
引用
收藏
页码:749 / 753
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of time delay in feedback control of linear quantum systems
    Nishio, K.
    Kashima, K.
    Imura, J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2009, 79 (06):
  • [42] Faster Quantum-inspired Algorithms for Solving Linear Systems
    Shao, Changpeng
    Montanaro, Ashley
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON QUANTUM COMPUTING, 2022, 3 (04):
  • [43] A Quantum Algorithm for RF-based Fingerprinting Localization Systems
    Shokry, Ahmed
    Youssef, Moustafa
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 47TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON LOCAL COMPUTER NETWORKS (LCN 2022), 2022, : 18 - 25
  • [44] When Entanglement Meets Classical Communications: Quantum Teleportation for the Quantum Internet
    Cacciapuoti, Angela Sara
    Caleffi, Marcello
    Van Meter, Rodney
    Hanzo, Lajos
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 68 (06) : 3808 - 3833
  • [45] Quantum data encoding: a comparative analysis of classical-to-quantum mapping techniques and their impact on machine learning accuracy
    Rath, Minati
    Date, Hema
    EPJ QUANTUM TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 11 (01)
  • [46] AN INVESTIGATION OF QUANTUM MD5 ALGORITHM AND ITS DESIGN, IMPLEMENTATION, AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WITH CLASSICAL MD5
    Biswas, Sumit
    Das, Prodipto
    Roy, Debasish
    Podder, Veeradittya
    Balba, Neil P.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, : 17 - 31
  • [47] QuDiet: A classical simulation platform for qubit-qudit hybrid quantum systems
    Chatterjee, Turbasu
    Das, Arnav
    Bala, Subhayu Kumar
    Saha, Amit
    Chattopadhyay, Anupam
    Chakrabarti, Amlan
    IET QUANTUM COMMUNICATION, 2023, 4 (04): : 167 - 180
  • [48] Machine Learning: Quantum vs Classical
    Khan, Tariq M.
    Robles-Kelly, Antonio
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 219275 - 219294
  • [49] Classical computation over quantum architectures
    Della Schiava, Alex
    Piazza, Carla
    Romanello, Riccardo
    JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2024, 34 (08) : 1526 - 1555
  • [50] A Comparative Study of Quantum and Classical Deletion
    Shen Yao
    Hao Liang
    Long Gui-Lu
    COMMUNICATIONS IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 53 (03) : 486 - 488