Recent Developments in Proteome Informatics for Mass Spectrometry Analysis

被引:10
作者
Wright, James C. [1 ,2 ]
Hubbard, Simon J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Fac Life Sci, Manchester M13 9PT, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Dept Vet Preclin Sci, Liverpool L69 7ZJ, Merseyside, England
关键词
Proteomics; bioinformatics; proteotypic peptides; miss cleavages; mass spectrometry; protein identification; protein databases; data standards; protein quantification; MISSED CLEAVAGE SITES; AVERAGE PEPTIDE SCORE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT; ABSOLUTE QUANTIFICATION; QUANTITATIVE PROTEOMICS; STATISTICAL-MODEL; IDENTIFICATION; PROTEINS; TANDEM; BIOINFORMATICS;
D O I
10.2174/138620709787315508
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Mass spectrometry has become the pre-eminent analytical method for the study of proteins and proteomes in post-genome science. The high volumes of complex spectra and data generated from such experiments represent new challenges for the field of bioinformatics. The past decade has seen an explosion of informatics tools targeted towards the processing, analysis, storage, and integration of mass spectrometry based proteomic data. In this review, some of the more recent developments in proteome informatics will be discussed. This includes new tools for predicting the properties of proteins and peptides which can be exploited in experimental proteomic design, and tools for the identification of peptides and proteins from their mass spectra. Similarly, informatics approaches are required for the move towards quantitative proteomics which are also briefly discussed. Finally, the growing number of proteomic data repositories and emerging data standards developed for the field are highlighted. These tools and technologies point the way towards the next phase of experimental proteomics and informatics challenges that the proteomics community will face.
引用
收藏
页码:194 / 202
页数:9
相关论文
共 99 条
[1]   Comparison of MS/MS methods for protein identification from 2D-PAGE [J].
Arrigoni, Giorgio ;
Fernandez, Celine ;
Holm, Cecilia ;
Scigelova, Michaela ;
James, Peter .
JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH, 2006, 5 (09) :2294-2300
[2]   Analysing proteomic data [J].
Barrett, J ;
Brophy, PM ;
Hamilton, JV .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR PARASITOLOGY, 2005, 35 (05) :543-553
[3]   The pitfalls of proteomics experiments without the correct use of bioinformatics tools [J].
Biron, David G. ;
Brun, Christine ;
Lefevre, Thierry ;
Lebarbenchon, Camille ;
Loxdale, Hugh D. ;
Chevenet, Francois ;
Brizard, Jean-Paul ;
Thomas, Frederic .
PROTEOMICS, 2006, 6 (20) :5577-5596
[4]  
Bradshaw RA, 2005, MOL CELL PROTEOMICS, V4, P1223
[5]   Reporting protein identification data - The next generation of guidelines [J].
Bradshaw, RA ;
Burlingame, AL ;
Carr, S ;
Aebersold, R .
MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2006, 5 (05) :787-788
[6]   The need for standards, not guidelines, in biological data reporting and sharing [J].
Burgoon, Lyle D. .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 24 (11) :1369-1373
[7]   Bioinformatic methods to exploit mass spectrometric data for proteomic applications [J].
Chalkley, RJ ;
Hansen, KC ;
Baldwin, MA .
BIOLOGICAL MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2005, 402 :289-312
[8]   Comprehensive analysis of a multidimensional liquid chromatography mass spectrometry dataset acquired on a quadrupole selecting, quadrupole collision cell, time-of-flight mass spectrometer - II. New developments in protein prospector allow for reliable and comprehensive automatic analysis of large datasets [J].
Chalkley, RJ ;
Baker, PR ;
Huang, L ;
Hansen, KC ;
Allen, NP ;
Rexach, M ;
Burlingame, AL .
MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2005, 4 (08) :1194-1204
[9]   Protein technologies - Editorial overview [J].
Chatterjee, Deb K. ;
LaBaer, Joshua .
CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 17 (04) :334-336
[10]   Advances in plant proteomics [J].
Chen, Sixue ;
Harmon, Alice C. .
PROTEOMICS, 2006, 6 (20) :5504-5516