Conceptualizations, Assessments, and Implications of Personal Recovery in Mental Illness: A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

被引:236
作者
van Weeghel, Jaap [1 ]
van Zelst, Catherine [2 ]
Boertien, Dienke [1 ]
Hasson-Ohayon, Ilanit [3 ]
机构
[1] Phrenos Ctr Expertise, Costakade 45, NL-5321 VS Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Psychiat & Neuropsychol, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Psychol, Ramat Gan, Israel
关键词
personal recovery; severe mental illness; recovery-oriented practice; scoping review; ORIENTED PRACTICES; HEALTH RECOVERY; META-SYNTHESIS; PSYCHOSIS; PEOPLE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; CARE; DEFINITION; FRAMEWORK; SETTINGS;
D O I
10.1037/prj0000356
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: Recovery, defined as a personal process of living with mental illness, has become a prominent concept in mental health care. We aimed to map the state of the art of conceptualizing recovery, its promoting and impeding factors, recovery-oriented practice, and the assessment of recovery. Method: A scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses was performed. Systematic searches were conducted, supplemented with hand-searching in reference lists. Results: Of 228 articles that were identified and 33 that were reviewed, a total of 25 were included. This review showed that the CHIME conceptual framework for personal recovery is widely endorsed, containing the elements of connectedness. hope and optimism, identity. meaning in life, and empowerment. Although personal recovery first and foremost starts from individual preferences, the CHIME framework should be adapted according to culture and unique population characteristics. "Difficulties and trauma" should be added, and the person's choice, risk taking, and coping with challenges should be emphasized. Barriers to recovery are stigma and negative effects of mental health services and medication. Facilitators of recovery include spirituality, personal agency, and social support. Recovery-focused interventions, in which peer providers are involved, enhance recovery, hope, and empowerment. For assessing recovery outcomes, multiple instruments are accepted as methodologically sound. Conclusions: Personal recovery is conceptualized as complementary to clinical recovery and represents processes rather than outcomes. Additional work is needed to bridge the gap between the concept of recovery-oriented practice and routinely provided interventions. A broad framework of recovery is needed, and more research is needed into the working mechanisms of personal recovery processes.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 181
页数:13
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Stages of recovery instrument: development of a measure of recovery from serious mental illness [J].
Andresen, Retta ;
Caputi, Peter ;
Oades, Lindsay .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 40 (11-12) :972-980
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, PHIL RELAT PERSP, DOI DOI 10.1093/MED/9780199691319.003.0016
[3]  
Anthony W.A., 1993, Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, V16, P11, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0095655
[4]   How effective is the comprehensive approach to rehabilitation (CARe) methodology? A cluster randomized controlled trial [J].
Bitter, Neis ;
Roeg, Diana ;
van Assen, Marcel ;
van Nieuwenhuizen, Chijs ;
van Weeghel, Jaap .
BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 17
[5]   A user-developed, user run recovery programme for people with severe mental illness: A randomised control trial [J].
Boevink, Wilma ;
Kroon, Hans ;
van Vugt, Maaike ;
Delespaul, Philippe ;
van Os, Jim .
PSYCHOSIS-PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIAL AND INTEGRATIVE APPROACHES, 2016, 8 (04) :287-300
[6]  
Campbell-Orde T., 2005, MEASURING PROMISE CO, VII
[7]   What is the work of Recovery Oriented Practice? A systematic literature review [J].
Chester, Polly ;
Ehrlich, Carolyn ;
Warburton, Loretta ;
Baker, David ;
Kendall, Elizabeth ;
Crompton, David .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2016, 25 (04) :270-285
[8]   What does recovery mean to a forensic mental health patient? A systematic review and narrative synthesis of the qualitative literature [J].
Clarke, C. ;
Lumbard, D. ;
Sambrook, S. ;
Kerr, K. .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY & PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 27 (01) :38-54
[9]   Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting [J].
Colquhoun, Heather L. ;
Levac, Danielle ;
O'Brien, Kelly K. ;
Straus, Sharon ;
Tricco, Andrea C. ;
Perrier, Laure ;
Kastner, Monika ;
Moher, David .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (12) :1291-1294
[10]   Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Mental Illness Self-management Using Wellness Recovery Action Planning [J].
Cook, Judith A. ;
Copeland, Mary Ellen ;
Jonikas, Jessica A. ;
Hamilton, Marie M. ;
Razzano, Lisa A. ;
Grey, Dennis D. ;
Floyd, Carol B. ;
Hudson, Walter B. ;
Macfarlane, Rachel T. ;
Carter, Tina M. ;
Boyd, Sherry .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2012, 38 (04) :881-891