Detection of cumulus cloud fields in satellite imagery

被引:10
|
作者
Nair, US [1 ]
Rushing, JA [1 ]
Ramachandran, R [1 ]
Kuo, KS [1 ]
Welch, RM [1 ]
Graves, SJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Atmospher Sci, Huntsville, AL 35899 USA
来源
EARTH OBSERVING SYSTEMS IV | 1999年 / 3750卷
关键词
cumulus clouds; cloud fields; structural thresholding; maximum likelihood classifier; oblique decision tree classifier; texture features;
D O I
10.1117/12.363530
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Boundary layer cumulus clouds are hard to detect in satellite imagery, especially for GOES imagery due to the coarse resolution of the infrared channels. Two different approaches for the detection of cumulus clouds in GOES satellite imagery are discussed and intercompared. The first type, structural thresholding, uses the morphology of cumulus cloud fields for detection. The second type, uses 1)classifiers based on texture and spectral, 2)edge detection and spectral, and 3)purely spectral features. For five selected scenes, cumulus cloud masks are created using these various methods and are compared against the expert-labeled masks. The structural thresholding method has the highest percentage of correct classification (764b), followed by classifier based on Laplacian edge detection features (74%). The classification time is lowest for the structural thesholding method, followed by classifiers based on spectral, edge detection, textural features. The structural thresholding method also is capable of detecting individual cumulus clouds within cloud fields. For the five scenes investigated, the average percentage of correct labeling of cumulus clouds by the structural thresholding method is 86%.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 355
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multiple Deep learning Methods for Small and Blurry Volcanic Ash Cloud Detection for Satellite Imagery
    Sakaino, Hidetomo
    Kleawsirikul, Nutnaree
    Leepaisomboon, Patamawadee
    Gaviphatt, Natnapat
    2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS 2022), 2022, : 1185 - 1188
  • [42] Automated Cloud Detection of Satellite Imagery Using Spatial Modeler Language and ERDAS Macro Language
    Laosuwan, Teerawong
    Pattanasethanon, Singthong
    Sa-ngiamvibool, Worawat
    IETE TECHNICAL REVIEW, 2013, 30 (03) : 183 - 190
  • [43] The effects of scattering angle and cumulus cloud geometry on satellite retrievals of cloud droplet effective radius
    Vant-Hull, Brian
    Marshak, Alexander
    Remer, Lorraine A.
    Li, Zhanqing
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2007, 45 (04): : 1039 - 1045
  • [44] CONVECTIVE CLOUD CLIMATOLOGIES CONSTRUCTED FROM SATELLITE IMAGERY
    KLITCH, MA
    WEAVER, JF
    KELLY, FP
    VONDERHAAR, TH
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 1985, 113 (03) : 326 - 337
  • [45] Automated extraction and identification of cloud systems in satellite imagery
    Bankert, RL
    Tag, PM
    EIGHTH CONFERENCE ON SATELLITE METEOROLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1996, : 373 - 376
  • [46] ESTIMATION OF CLOUD TOP HEIGHTS FROM SATELLITE IMAGERY
    MEKLER, Y
    PODOLAK, M
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1985, 24 (15): : 2419 - 2422
  • [47] FRAUNHOFFER DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE CLOUD IMAGERY.
    Naidu, P.S.
    Reddy, V.V.Krishna
    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 1987, GE-25 (04): : 477 - 480
  • [48] FRAUNHOFER-DIFFRACTION ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE CLOUD IMAGERY
    NAIDU, PS
    REDDY, VVK
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1987, 25 (04): : 477 - 480
  • [50] FRONTAL CLOUD MOVEMENT FROM GRIDDED SATELLITE IMAGERY
    BRANDLI, HW
    MUNSON, RD
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 1976, 104 (07) : 972 - 974