Exploratory and spatial data analysis (EDA-SDA) for determining regional background levels and anomalies of potentially toxic elements in soils from Catorce-Matehuala, Mexico

被引:42
作者
Chipres, J. A. [1 ,2 ]
Castro-Larragoitia, J. [3 ]
Monroy, M. G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma San Luis Potosi, Ctr Estudios, San Luis Potosi 78210, Mexico
[2] Univ Autonoma San Luis Potosi, Serv Sistemas Ambientales, San Luis Potosi 78210, Mexico
[3] Univ Autonoma San Luis Potosi, Inst Geol, Fac Ingn, San Luis Potosi 78240, Mexico
关键词
GEOCHEMICAL BASE-LINE; RISK-ASSESSMENT; SURFACE SOILS; THRESHOLD; CONTAMINATION; CONSEQUENCES; POLLUTION; MAPS; AREA; GIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.04.022
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The threshold between geochemical background and anomalies can be influenced by the methodology selected for its estimation. Environmental evaluations, particularly those conducted in mineralized areas, must consider this when trying to determinate the natural geochemical status of a study area, quantifying human impacts, or establishing soil restoration values for contaminated sites. Some methods in environmental geochemistry incorporate the premise that anomalies (natural or anthropogenic) and background data are characterized by their own probabilistic distributions. One of these methods uses exploratory data analysis (EDA) on regional geochemical data sets coupled with a geographic information system (GIS) to spatially understand the processes that influence the geochemical landscape in a technique that can be called a spatial data analysis (SDA). This EDA-SDA methodology was used to establish the regional background range from the area of Catorce-Matehuala in north-central Mexico. Probability plots of the data, particularly for those areas affected by human activities, show that the regional geochemical background population is composed of smaller subpopulations associated with factors such as soil type and parent material. This paper demonstrates that the EDA-SDA method offers more certainty in defining thresholds between geochemical background and anomaly than a numeric technique, making it a useful tool for regional geochemical landscape analysis and environmental geochemistry studies. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1579 / 1589
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Adriano D C., 2001, Trace element in terrestrial environments: biogeochemistry, bioavailability and risks of metals
  • [2] ATSDR, 2007, TOX PROF LEAD
  • [3] An application of exploratory data analysis (EDA) as a robust non-parametric technique for geochernical mapping in a semi-arid climate
    Bounessah, M
    Atkin, BP
    [J]. APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2003, 18 (08) : 1185 - 1195
  • [4] BRECKENRIDGE RP, 1995, DETEMINATION BACKGRO
  • [5] GIS and geostatistics: Essential partners for spatial analysis
    Burrough, PA
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2001, 8 (04) : 361 - 377
  • [6] 200 years of mining activities at La Paz San Luis Potosi Mexico - Consequences for environment and geochemical exploration
    CastroLarragoitia, J
    Kramar, U
    Puchelt, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION, 1997, 58 (01) : 81 - 91
  • [7] Assessment of trace metal distribution and contamination in surface soils of Hong Kong
    Chen, TB
    Wong, JWC
    Zhou, HY
    Wong, MH
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 1997, 96 (01) : 61 - 68
  • [8] A spatial analysis method for geochemical anomaly separation
    Cheng, QM
    Agterberg, FP
    BonhamCarter, GF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION, 1996, 56 (03) : 183 - 195
  • [9] Geochemical mapping of major and trace elements in soils from the Altiplano Potosino, Mexico:: a multi-scale comparison
    Chipres, J. A.
    Salinas, J. C.
    Castro-Larragoitia, J.
    Monroy, M. G.
    [J]. GEOCHEMISTRY-EXPLORATION ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS, 2008, 8 (3-4) : 279 - 290
  • [10] Protocol development for assessing arsenic background concentrations in Florida urban soils
    Chirenje, T
    Ma, LQ
    Hornsby, AG
    Portier, K
    Harris, W
    Latimer, S
    Zillioux, EJ
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL FORENSICS, 2001, 2 (02) : 141 - 153