Assessing conservation priorities of endemic freshwater fishes in the Tropical Andes region

被引:24
|
作者
Tognelli, Marcelo F. [1 ]
Anderson, Elizabeth P. [2 ,3 ]
Jimenez-Segura, Luz F. [4 ]
Chuctaya, Junior [5 ,6 ]
Chocano, Luisa [6 ]
Maldonado-Ocampo, Javier A. [7 ]
Mesa-Salazar, Lina [8 ]
Mojica, Jose I. [9 ]
Carvajal-Vallejos, Fernando M. [10 ]
Correa, Vanessa [6 ]
Ortega, Hernan [6 ]
Rivadeneira Romero, Juan F. [11 ]
Sanchez-Duarte, Paula [8 ]
Cox, Neil A. [1 ]
Hidalgo, Max [6 ]
Jimenez Prado, Pedro [12 ]
Lasso, Carlos A. [8 ]
Sarmiento, Jaime [13 ]
Velasquez, Miguel A. [6 ]
Villa-Navarro, Francisco A. [14 ]
机构
[1] IUCN, CI, Biodivers Assessment Unit, Arlington, VA USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Dept Earth & Environm, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[3] Florida Int Univ, Inst Water & Environm, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[4] Univ Antioquia, Inst Biol, Grp Ictiol, Medellin, Colombia
[5] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[6] Univ Nacl Mayor San Marcos, Museo Hist Nat, Lima, Peru
[7] Pontificia Univ Javeriana, Dept Biol, Bogota, Colombia
[8] Inst Invest Recursos Biol Alexander von Humboldt, Bogota, Colombia
[9] Univ Nacl Colombia, Inst Ciencias Natur, Bogota, Colombia
[10] FAUNAGUA, Cochabamba, Bolivia
[11] Univ Cent Ecuador, Fac Ciencias Biol, Quito, Ecuador
[12] Pontificia Univ Catolica Ecuador Sede Esmeraldas, Esmeraldas, Ecuador
[13] Museo Nacl Hist Nat, La Paz, Bolivia
[14] Univ Tolima, Fac Ciencias, Ibague, Colombia
关键词
climate change; fish; gap analysis; protected areas; red list; river; PROTECTED AREAS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RESERVE NETWORK; BIODIVERSITY; CHALLENGES; DIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; PROGRESS; THREATS;
D O I
10.1002/aqc.2971
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Assessing the effectiveness of protected areas for sustaining species and identifying priority sites for their conservation is vital for decision making, particularly for freshwater fishes in South America, the global centre of freshwater fish diversity. Several conservation planning studies have used threatened freshwater fishes or species that are vulnerable to climate change as conservation targets, but none has included both in priority-setting analysis. The objectives of this study were to identify gaps in the coverage of the existing protected areas in representing the endemic freshwater fishes of the Tropical Andes region, and to identify conservation priority areas that adequately cover threatened species and species vulnerable to climate change. Data on 648 freshwater fishes from the Tropical Andes were used to identify gaps in the protected area coverage, and to identify conservation priority sites under three scenarios: (i) prioritize threatened species; (ii) prioritize species that are vulnerable to climate change; and (iii) prioritize both threatened species and species vulnerable to climate change. A total of 571 species (88% of all species) were not covered by any protected areas; most of them are restricted to <= 10 catchments. To represent both threatened species and species vulnerable to climate change in the third scenario, 635 catchments were identified as priority areas, representing 26.5% of the study area. The number of irreplaceable catchments for this scenario is 475, corresponding to 22.5% of the total area. The results of this study could be crucial for designing strategies for the effective protection of native fish populations in the Tropical Andes, and for planning proactive climate adaptation. It is hoped that the identification of priority areas, particularly irreplaceable catchments, will help to guide conservation and management decisions in the Andean region.
引用
收藏
页码:1123 / 1132
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Assessment of efficiency and impacts of gillnets on fish conservation in a tropical freshwater fishery
    Silvano, Renato A. M.
    Hallwass, Gustavo
    Juras, Anastacio A.
    Lopes, Priscila F. M.
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2017, 27 (02) : 521 - 533
  • [32] Evaluating functional diversity conservation for freshwater fishes resulting from terrestrial protected areas
    Lamothe, Karl A.
    Alofs, Karen M.
    Chu, Cindy
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (11) : 2057 - 2070
  • [33] Extinction risk and conservation priority analyses for 64 endemic fishes in the Upper Yangtze River, China
    Zhang, Xiong
    Gao, Xin
    Wang, Jianwei
    Cao, Wenxuan
    ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY OF FISHES, 2015, 98 (01) : 261 - 272
  • [34] Role of micro-reserves in conservation of endemic, rare and endangered plants of the Valencian region (Eastern Spain)
    Laguna, Emilio
    Fos, Simon
    Jimenez, Juan
    Volis, Sergei
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES, 2016, 63 (04) : 320 - 332
  • [35] Assessing the societal benefits of mahseer (Tor spp.) fishes to strengthen the basis for their conservation
    Everard, Mark
    Pinder, Adrian C.
    Claussen, Julie E.
    Orr, Stuart
    AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2021, 31 (10) : 2979 - 2986
  • [36] Endemism and evolutionary history in conflict over Madagascar's freshwater conservation priorities
    Isambert, B.
    Bergsten, J.
    Monaghan, M. T.
    Andriamizehy, H.
    Ranarilalatiana, T.
    Ratsimbazafy, M.
    Andriniainimanana, J. R.
    Vogler, A. P.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 144 (06) : 1902 - 1909
  • [37] Principal threats to the conservation of freshwater habitats in the continental biogeographical region of Central Europe
    Grzybowski, Miroslaw
    Glinska-Lewczuk, Katarzyna
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 28 (14) : 4065 - 4097
  • [38] A review of amphidromous freshwater fishes of the Choco biogeographical region (Colombia and Ecuador): diversity, ecology, fisheries and conservation
    Carlo Sanchez-Garces, Gian
    CYBIUM, 2017, 41 (02): : 157 - 169
  • [39] Conservation gaps and priorities of range-restricted birds in the Northern Andes
    Medina, Wilderson
    Pimm, Stuart L.
    Huang, Ryan M.
    PEERJ, 2024, 12
  • [40] Assessing Potential Conservation and Restoration Areas of Freshwater Fish Fauna in the Indian River Basins
    Bhatt, Jay P.
    Manish, Kumar
    Mehta, Rajender
    Pandit, Maharaj K.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 57 (05) : 1098 - 1111