Exploring Adverse Events and Utilization of Topical Hemostatic Agents in Surgery

被引:5
作者
O'Hanlan, Katherine A. [1 ,3 ]
Bassett, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Laparoscop Inst Gynecol & Oncol, Portola Valley, CA USA
[2] Meridian HealthComms, Plumley, England
[3] Laparoscop Inst Gynecol & Oncol, 40 Buckeye Court, Portola Valley, CA 94028 USA
关键词
Fibrin sealant system; Oxidized cellulose powder; Starch powder; Surgical hemostasis; OXIDIZED REGENERATED CELLULOSE; COMPLICATIONS; RISK;
D O I
10.4293/JSLS.2022.00033
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: This retrospective study provides preliminary qualitative assessment of the adverse events (AEs), focusing on pelvic and abdominal AEs and patient outcomes reported for three hemostatic agents used in gynecologic surgery. Methods: Utilization rates for oxidized regenerated cellu-lose powder (ORC), polysaccharide powder (PSP), and fibrin sealant solution (FSS) were obtained from hospitals via the Premier Healthcare databases for all surgical pro-cedures from January 1, 2018 to September 30, 2020. All reported cases were extracted from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for ORC and PSP and from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for FSS. Distributions of AEs by ana-tomical site (MAUDE/FAERS) and surgical procedures by specialty (Premier) were evaluated for each product. Number of cases and number and types of AEs were compared to the total utilization for each product. Results: PSP was the most used product during the period analyzed (n =126,509 uses), followed by FSS (n = 80,628 uses), and ORC (n = 41,583 uses). Distribution of surgical procedures by anatomical site varied significantly between hemostatic agents (p < 0.001). ORC was associated with more patient cases with AEs and numbers of reported AEs compared with PSP and FSS (p < 0.001). ORC was associated with higher number of infections than PSP (p < 0.001) and FSS (p < 0.001). Conclusion: These findings suggest that ORC use in ab-dominal and pelvic surgery may result in more postopera-tive complications compared with non-ORC hemostatic agents. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to compare efficacy and safety of these products.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Abou Arisheh M, 2020, AM SURGEON, V86, P386
  • [2] ACOG Committee on Gynecologic practice, 2020, OBSTET GYNECOL, V136, P81
  • [3] Baxter, TISSEEL FIBR SEAL PR
  • [4] BD, AR AH INSTR US
  • [5] Behbehani S, 2013, OBSTET GYNECOL, V121, P447, DOI [10.1097/AOG.0b013e318276ce3f, http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e318276ce3f]
  • [6] Brooks M., 2015, Medscape
  • [7] A systematic review on the use of topical hemostats in trauma and emergency surgery
    Chiara, Osvaldo
    Cimbanassi, Stefania
    Bellanova, Giovanni
    Chiarugi, Massimo
    Mingoli, Andrea
    Olivero, Giorgio
    Ribaldi, Sergio
    Tugnoli, Gregorio
    Basilico, Silvia
    Bindi, Francesca
    Briani, Laura
    Renzi, Federica
    Chirletti, Piero
    Di Grezia, Giuseppe
    Martino, Antonio
    Marzaioli, Rinaldo
    Noschese, Giuseppe
    Portolani, Nazario
    Ruscelli, Paolo
    Zago, Mauro
    Sgardello, Sebastian
    Stagnitti, Franco
    Miniello, Stefano
    [J]. BMC SURGERY, 2018, 18
  • [8] An international multidisciplinary peer-driven consensus on the optimal use of hemostatic powders in surgical practice
    Eden, C.
    Buonomo, O. C.
    Busch, J.
    Gilabert-Estelles, J.
    Medrano, R.
    Nosotti, M.
    Renaud, S.
    Walker, I.
    Williams, N.
    Carlini, Massimo
    [J]. UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2021, 73 (04) : 1267 - 1273
  • [9] Ethicon, SURGICEL POWD INSTR
  • [10] Risk of Postoperative Pelvic Abscess in Major Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: One-Year Single-Institution Experience
    Fagotti, Anna
    Costantini, Barbara
    Fanfani, Francesco
    Vizzielli, Giuseppe
    Rossitto, Cristiano
    Lecca, Antonella
    Scambia, Giovanni
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (09) : 2452 - 2458