Translation and validation of the Tibetan confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit

被引:5
作者
Danzeng, Qu-Zhen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cui, Na [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Wen-Jun [3 ]
Long, Yun [1 ,2 ]
Deji, Yang-Zong [3 ]
Ze, Cheng [3 ]
Ren, Zeng [4 ]
机构
[1] Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Tibet Autonomous Reg Peoples Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Lhasa 850000, Tibet, Peoples R China
[4] Tibet Autonomous Reg Peoples Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Lhasa 850000, Tibet, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Delirium; Tibet; CAM-ICU; Validation; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; CULTURAL-ADAPTATION; DELIRIUM DIAGNOSIS; DSM-IV; CAM; RELIABILITY; GUIDELINES; PREDICTOR; VALIDITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/CM9.0000000000000168
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: At present, there is no available delirium translated assessment method for 3.3 million Tibetans. This study aimed to provide a method for delirium assessment for Tibetan patients speaking this language by validating a translation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Methods: The study was conducted between July 2018 and November 2018. Patients were screened for delirium by a neurologist using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (DSM-IV). Patients were subsequently screened by two nurses using Tibetan translations of the CAM-ICU. With DSM-IV criterion as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to assess the validity of the CAM-ICU criterion. Interrater reliability was determined by comparing the CAM-ICU ratings of nurse 1 vs. nurse 2 using the kappa coefficient. Results: Ninety-six patients were assessed independently by two nurses and one neurologist. According to DSM-IV standard, 42 out of 96 (43.8%) patients developed delirium. The sensitivities of Tibetan CAM-ICU were 90.5% for nurse 1 and 92.9% for nurse 2, respectively. Their specificities were 85.2% and 90.7%, respectively. The PPV were 82.6% for nurse 1 and 88.6% for nurse 2. Their NPV were 92.0% and 94.2%, respectively. The Tibetan CAM-ICU was done with good interrater reliability between nurse 1 and nurse 2 (kappa = 0.91, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The Tibetan CAM-ICU shows good validity and might be incorporated into clinical practice in Tibetan Intensive Care Units.
引用
收藏
页码:1154 / 1158
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sedation in intensive care unit
    Akrout, Maha Touaibia
    Laatar, Chahir
    Chanques, Gerald
    ANESTHESIE & REANIMATION, 2022, 8 (04): : 414 - 420
  • [42] Diagnosing delirium in critically ill children: Validity and reliability of the Pediatric Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit
    Smith, Heidi A. B.
    Boyd, Jenny
    Fuchs, D. Catherine
    Melvin, Kelly
    Berry, Pamela
    Shintani, Ayumi
    Eden, Svetlana K.
    Terrell, Michelle K.
    Boswell, Tonya
    Wolfram, Karen
    Sopfe, Jenna
    Barr, Frederick E.
    Pandharipande, Pratik P.
    Ely, E. Wesley
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (01) : 150 - 157
  • [43] Fluctuations of consciousness after stroke: Associations with the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and potential undetected delirium
    Reznik, Michael E.
    Daiello, Lori A.
    Thompson, Bradford B.
    Wendell, Linda C.
    Mahta, Ali
    Potter, N. Stevenson
    Yaghi, Shadi
    Levy, Mitchell M.
    Fehnel, Corey R.
    Furie, Karen L.
    Jones, Richard N.
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 56 : 58 - 62
  • [44] DECREASING INAPPROPRIATE UNABLE-TO-ASSESS RATINGS FOR THE CONFUSION ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
    Swan, Joshua T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2014, 23 (01) : 60 - 68
  • [45] Different assessment tools for intensive care unit delirium: Which score to use?
    Luetz, Alawi
    Heymann, Anja
    Radtke, Finn M.
    Chenitir, Chokri
    Neuhaus, Ulrike
    Nachtigall, Irit
    von Dossow, Vera
    Marz, Susanne
    Eggers, Verena
    Heinz, Andreas
    Wernecke, Klaus D.
    Spies, Claudia D.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (02) : 409 - 418
  • [46] Validation of the confusion assessment method in the palliative care setting
    Ryan, K.
    Leonard, M.
    Guerin, S.
    Donnelly, S.
    Conroy, M.
    Meagher, D.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 23 (01) : 40 - 45
  • [47] Implementation, reliability testing, and compliance monitoring of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit in trauma patients
    Soja, Stacie L.
    Pandharipande, Pratik P.
    Fleming, SloanB.
    Cotton, Bryan A.
    Miller, Leanna R.
    Weaver, Stefanija G.
    Lee, Byron T.
    Ely, E. Wesley
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 34 (07) : 1263 - 1268
  • [48] Use of the brief Confusion Assessment Method in a veteran palliative care population: A pilot validation study
    Wilson, Jo Ellen
    Boehm, Leanne
    Samuels, Lauren R.
    Unger, Deborah
    Leonard, Martha
    Roumie, Christianne
    Ely, E. Wesley
    Dittus, Robert S.
    Misra, Sumi
    Han, Jin H.
    PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2019, 17 (05) : 569 - 573
  • [49] Implementation, reliability testing, and compliance monitoring of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit in trauma patients
    Stacie L. Soja
    Pratik P. Pandharipande
    Sloan B. Fleming
    Bryan A. Cotton
    Leanna R. Miller
    Stefanija G. Weaver
    Byron T. Lee
    E. Wesley Ely
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2008, 34 : 1263 - 1268
  • [50] Evaluating the implementation of confusion assessment method-intensive care unit using a quality improvement approach
    Stewart, C.
    Bench, S.
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 23 (04) : 172 - 178