Translation and validation of the Tibetan confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit

被引:5
作者
Danzeng, Qu-Zhen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cui, Na [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Wen-Jun [3 ]
Long, Yun [1 ,2 ]
Deji, Yang-Zong [3 ]
Ze, Cheng [3 ]
Ren, Zeng [4 ]
机构
[1] Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Tibet Autonomous Reg Peoples Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Lhasa 850000, Tibet, Peoples R China
[4] Tibet Autonomous Reg Peoples Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Lhasa 850000, Tibet, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Delirium; Tibet; CAM-ICU; Validation; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; CULTURAL-ADAPTATION; DELIRIUM DIAGNOSIS; DSM-IV; CAM; RELIABILITY; GUIDELINES; PREDICTOR; VALIDITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/CM9.0000000000000168
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: At present, there is no available delirium translated assessment method for 3.3 million Tibetans. This study aimed to provide a method for delirium assessment for Tibetan patients speaking this language by validating a translation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Methods: The study was conducted between July 2018 and November 2018. Patients were screened for delirium by a neurologist using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (DSM-IV). Patients were subsequently screened by two nurses using Tibetan translations of the CAM-ICU. With DSM-IV criterion as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to assess the validity of the CAM-ICU criterion. Interrater reliability was determined by comparing the CAM-ICU ratings of nurse 1 vs. nurse 2 using the kappa coefficient. Results: Ninety-six patients were assessed independently by two nurses and one neurologist. According to DSM-IV standard, 42 out of 96 (43.8%) patients developed delirium. The sensitivities of Tibetan CAM-ICU were 90.5% for nurse 1 and 92.9% for nurse 2, respectively. Their specificities were 85.2% and 90.7%, respectively. The PPV were 82.6% for nurse 1 and 88.6% for nurse 2. Their NPV were 92.0% and 94.2%, respectively. The Tibetan CAM-ICU was done with good interrater reliability between nurse 1 and nurse 2 (kappa = 0.91, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The Tibetan CAM-ICU shows good validity and might be incorporated into clinical practice in Tibetan Intensive Care Units.
引用
收藏
页码:1154 / 1158
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sensitivity and specificity of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) for detecting post-cardiac surgery delirium: A single-center study in Japan
    Nishimura, Katsuji
    Yokoyama, Kanako
    Yamauchi, Noriko
    Koizumi, Masako
    Harasawa, Nozomi
    Yasuda, Taeko
    Mimura, Chizuru
    Igita, Hazuki
    Suzuki, Eriko
    Uchiide, Yoko
    Seino, Yusuke
    Nomura, Minoru
    Yamazaki, Kenji
    Ishigooka, Jun
    HEART & LUNG, 2016, 45 (01): : 15 - 20
  • [32] Delirium in older patients: a diagnostic study of NEECHAM Confusion Scale in surgical intensive care unit
    Matarese, Maria
    Generoso, Stefano
    Ivziku, Dhurata
    Pedone, Claudio
    De Marinis, Maria Grazia
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2013, 22 (19-20) : 2849 - 2857
  • [33] Educational intervention on delirium assessment using confusion assessment method-ICU (CAM-ICU) in a general intensive care unit
    Ramoo, Vimala
    Abu, Harlinna
    Rai, Vineya
    Singh, Surindar Kaur Surat
    Baharudin, Ayuni Asma'
    Danaee, Mahmoud
    Thinagaran, Raveena Rajalachimi R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (21-22) : 4028 - 4039
  • [34] The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC) for the diagnosis of delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies
    Gusmao-Flores, Dimitri
    Salluh, Jorge Ibrain Figueira
    Chalhub, Ricardo Avila
    Quarantini, Lucas C.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 16 (04):
  • [35] Comparison of delirium assessment tools in a mixed intensive care unit
    van Eijk, Maarten M. J.
    van Marum, Rob J.
    Klijn, Ine A. M.
    de Wit, Nelleke
    Kesecioglu, Jozef
    Slooter, Arjen J. C.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (06) : 1881 - 1885
  • [36] Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
    Ely, EW
    Margolin, R
    Francis, J
    May, L
    Truman, B
    Dittus, R
    Speroff, T
    Gautam, S
    Bernard, GR
    Inouye, SK
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (07) : 1370 - 1379
  • [37] Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit (CAM-ICU)
    Maha H. Aljuaid
    Ahmad M. Deeb
    Maamoun Dbsawy
    Daniah Alsayegh
    Moteb Alotaibi
    Yaseen M. Arabi
    BMC Psychiatry, 18
  • [38] An Innovative Approach to Improving the Accuracy of Delirium Assessments Using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit
    DiLibero, Justin
    O'Donoghue, Sharon C.
    DeSanto-Madeya, Susan
    Felix, Janice
    Ninobla, Annalyn
    Woods, Allison
    DIMENSIONS OF CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2016, 35 (02) : 74 - 80
  • [39] Routine use of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) by bedside nurses may underdiagnose delirium
    Reade, Michael C.
    Eastwood, Glenn M.
    Peck, Leah
    Bellomo, Rinaldo
    Baldwin, Ian
    CRITICAL CARE AND RESUSCITATION, 2011, 13 (04) : 217 - 225
  • [40] Validation of the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist in nonintubated intensive care unit patients in a resource-poor medical intensive care setting in South India
    George, Christina
    Nair, Jayakrishnan Sukumaran
    Ebenezer, Johann Alex
    Gangadharan, Alan
    ChristuDas, Anna
    Gnanaseelan, Libu Kanakamma
    Jacob, K. S.
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 26 (02) : 138 - 143