Translation and validation of the Tibetan confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit

被引:5
作者
Danzeng, Qu-Zhen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cui, Na [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Wen-Jun [3 ]
Long, Yun [1 ,2 ]
Deji, Yang-Zong [3 ]
Ze, Cheng [3 ]
Ren, Zeng [4 ]
机构
[1] Peking Union Med Coll, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] Tibet Autonomous Reg Peoples Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Lhasa 850000, Tibet, Peoples R China
[4] Tibet Autonomous Reg Peoples Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Lhasa 850000, Tibet, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Delirium; Tibet; CAM-ICU; Validation; MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS; CULTURAL-ADAPTATION; DELIRIUM DIAGNOSIS; DSM-IV; CAM; RELIABILITY; GUIDELINES; PREDICTOR; VALIDITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/CM9.0000000000000168
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: At present, there is no available delirium translated assessment method for 3.3 million Tibetans. This study aimed to provide a method for delirium assessment for Tibetan patients speaking this language by validating a translation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Methods: The study was conducted between July 2018 and November 2018. Patients were screened for delirium by a neurologist using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (DSM-IV). Patients were subsequently screened by two nurses using Tibetan translations of the CAM-ICU. With DSM-IV criterion as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to assess the validity of the CAM-ICU criterion. Interrater reliability was determined by comparing the CAM-ICU ratings of nurse 1 vs. nurse 2 using the kappa coefficient. Results: Ninety-six patients were assessed independently by two nurses and one neurologist. According to DSM-IV standard, 42 out of 96 (43.8%) patients developed delirium. The sensitivities of Tibetan CAM-ICU were 90.5% for nurse 1 and 92.9% for nurse 2, respectively. Their specificities were 85.2% and 90.7%, respectively. The PPV were 82.6% for nurse 1 and 88.6% for nurse 2. Their NPV were 92.0% and 94.2%, respectively. The Tibetan CAM-ICU was done with good interrater reliability between nurse 1 and nurse 2 (kappa = 0.91, P < 0.001). Conclusion: The Tibetan CAM-ICU shows good validity and might be incorporated into clinical practice in Tibetan Intensive Care Units.
引用
收藏
页码:1154 / 1158
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nurses' and physicians' perceptions of Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit for delirium detection: focus group study
    Oxenboll-Collet, Marie
    Egerod, Ingrid
    Christensen, Vibeke
    Jensen, Jeannette
    Thomsen, Thordis
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 23 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [22] Poststroke delirium incidence and outcomes: Validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
    Mitasova, Adela
    Kostalova, Milena
    Bednarik, Josef
    Michalcakova, Radka
    Kasparek, Tomas
    Balabanova, Petra
    Dusek, Ladislav
    Vohanka, Stanislav
    Ely, E. Wesley
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (02) : 484 - 490
  • [23] The confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit in patients with cirrhosis
    Eric S. Orman
    Anthony Perkins
    Marwan Ghabril
    Babar A. Khan
    Naga Chalasani
    Malaz A. Boustani
    Metabolic Brain Disease, 2015, 30 : 1063 - 1071
  • [24] Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
    Klugkist, M.
    Sedemund-Adib, B.
    Schmidtke, C.
    Schmucker, P.
    Sievers, H. H.
    Hueppe, M.
    ANAESTHESIST, 2008, 57 (05): : 464 - +
  • [25] The validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU): A prospective cohort study
    Selim, Abeer
    Kandeel, Nahed
    Elokl, Mohamed
    Khater, Mohamed Shawky
    Saleh, Ashraf Nabil
    Bustami, Rami
    Ely, E. Wesley
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2017, 80 : 83 - 89
  • [26] Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) for the diagnosis of delirium in adults in critical care settings
    Miranda, Fabian
    Gonzalez, Francisco
    Plana, Maria Nieves
    Zamora, Javier
    Quinn, Terry J.
    Seron, Pamela
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, (11):
  • [27] Comparing the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit and Neelon and Champagne Confusion Scale for assessing delirium in non-intubated intensive care patients
    Locihova, Hana
    Pelikanova, Jana
    KONTAKT-JOURNAL OF NURSING AND SOCIAL SCIENCES RELATED TO HEALTH AND ILLNESS, 2022, 24 (01): : 36 - 42
  • [28] Spanish version of the method for evaluation of confusion in intensive cares, pilot study of validation
    Tor, A. C.
    Escobar, L. M.
    Franco, J. G.
    Diaz-Gomez, J. L.
    Munoz, J. F.
    Molina, F.
    Bejarano, J.
    Yepes, D.
    Navarro, E.
    Garcia, A.
    Ely, E. Wesley
    Esteban, A.
    MEDICINA INTENSIVA, 2010, 34 (01) : 14 - 21
  • [29] Validity and predictability of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit for delirium among critically ill patients in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yue
    Diao, Dongmei
    Zhang, Hao
    Gao, Yongli
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 29 (06) : 1204 - 1214
  • [30] On pediatric delirium and the use of the Pediatric Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit
    Schieveld, Jan N. M.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (01) : 220 - 221