Potential Cost Implications for All US Food and Drug Administration Oncology Drug Approvals in 2018

被引:35
作者
DeMartino, Patrick C. [1 ]
Miljkovic, Milos D. [2 ]
Prasad, Vinay [3 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Pediat Hematol & Oncol, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Pk Rd, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] NCI, Med Oncol Serv, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
CANCER DRUG;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5921
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This economic evaluation study estimates the number of patients with cancer who are eligible for the newly approved drug-indication pairs and projects potential spending and use of the approvals in the United States. Importance The growth of cancer drug spending in the US has outpaced spending in nearly all other sectors, and an increasing proportion of the drug development pipeline is devoted to oncology. In 2018, there was a record number of drugs entering the US market. Objective To estimate the number of patients with cancer who are eligible for the newly approved drug-indication pairs, and project potential spending and use of the approvals in the US. Design, Setting, Participants This is a retrospective review of 2018 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oncology drug approvals with estimation of the eligible population. The cost of new therapy was estimated, and savings from displaced therapies were subtracted. Two-way sensitivity analysis explored uncertainty in pricing and market diffusion. Data were collected between March 1, 2019, and September 30, 2019. Exposures Data related to the cancer drug approval (ie, indications, approval pathway, basis for approval), cancer incidence, and drug price were extracted from publicly available sources, including the FDA, National Cancer Institute, and American Cancer Society websites, as well as the RED BOOK database. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the projected net expenditure in the US associated with the new therapies. The secondary outcome described how variable market diffusion and pricing permit expected levels of spending. Results A total of 46 oncology approvals were included in the analysis, with 17 novel drugs and 29 new indications. The average price per patient per treatment course was $150384. From a national perspective and with 100% market diffusion, the projected net expenditure for newly approved drugs was $39.5 billion per year. To maintain the recent trend of cancer drug spending, the 2018 cancer drug approvals need to be used in fewer than 20% of eligible patients. Conclusions and Relevance New cancer drugs approved by the FDA in 2018 would drastically increase cancer drug spending in the US if used widely. Alternatively, only low-level use of the new drugs is consistent with market forecasting. Question For cancer drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2018, what is the potential influence on cancer drug spending, and how many patients may receive the new approvals? Finding This economic evaluation study determined that if used in all eligible patients, the 2018 oncology drug approvals would add $39.5 billion to US cancer drug spending (>75% increase from total 2017 cancer drug spending). Using the approved drugs in fewer than 20% of eligible patients would be consistent with industry forecasting for drug spending. Meaning The US would face an unprecedented increase in cancer drug spending if 2018 oncology drug approvals are used widely, while only limited uptake of the drugs maintains the current spending trajectories.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 167
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], NAT HLTH EXP PROJ 20
  • [2] Use of targeted therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma in the Veterans Health Administration
    Aspinall, Sherrie L.
    Zhao, Xinhua
    Geraci, Mark C.
    Good, Chester B.
    Cunningham, Francesca E.
    Heron, Bernadette B.
    Becker, Daniel
    Lee, Steve
    Prasad, Vinay
    Passero, Vida
    Shields, Jenna
    Stone, Roslyn A.
    Carico, Ron
    Szymanski, John
    Taqi, Alyssa
    Blauvelt, Amy
    Sanderson, Jennifer
    Gass, Michael
    Minor, Chelsea
    LaPlant, Kourtney
    Suliman, Iman
    Twedt, Elaine
    Nelson, Megan
    Paul, Betsy
    Dowd, Robert
    Keefe, Sean
    Wenzell, Candice
    Horn, Greg
    Carroll, Brett
    Wenzell, Rob
    Panning, David
    Kaster, Lindsay
    Hunt, Lindsey
    Butler, Katerina
    Carr, Robert
    Kampschmidt, Camille
    Nawarskas, Ann
    Tonnu-Mihara, Ivy
    Wu, Ni-Chi
    Tseng, Eugene
    Banaszynski, Megan
    Crawford, Russell
    Do, Brian
    Crandall, Bailey
    Serbas, Lianna
    Hammond, Julia
    Chillari, Kelly
    Tague, Marshall
    Stauder, Alison
    Crawford, Brooke
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (15): : 6651 - 6661
  • [3] Centers for Medicare Medicaid Services, NAT HLTH EXP FACT SH NAT HLTH EXP FACT SH
  • [4] Friedberg MW, 2017, JAMA INTERN MED, V177, P1058, DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2142
  • [5] Trajectories of Injectable Cancer Drug Costs After Launch in the United States
    Gordon, Noa
    Stemmer, Salomon M.
    Greenberg, Dan
    Goldstein, Daniel A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (04) : 319 - +
  • [6] Guzman G., 2019, NEW DATA SHOW INCOME
  • [7] Assessment of the Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Receiving Accelerated Approval
    Gyawali, Bishal
    Hey, Spencer Phillips
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 179 (07) : 906 - 913
  • [8] Estimation of the Percentage of US Patients With Cancer Who Are Eligible for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Drugs
    Haslam, Alyson
    Gill, Jennifer
    Prasad, Vinay
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (03)
  • [9] Estimation of the Percentage of US Patients With Cancer Who Are Eligible for and Respond to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Drugs
    Haslam, Alyson
    Prasad, Vinay
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (05)
  • [10] Five Years of Cancer Drug Approvals: Innovation, Efficacy, and Costs
    Mailankody, Sham
    Prasad, Vinay
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2015, 1 (04) : 539 - 540