Personalized Pancreatic Cancer Management A Systematic Review of How Machine Learning Is Supporting Decision-making

被引:16
作者
Bradley, Alison [1 ,2 ]
van der Meer, Robert [1 ]
McKay, Colin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Business Sch, Dept Management Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Glasgow Royal Infirm, West Scotland Pancreat Canc Unit, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
machine learning; pancreatic cancer; decision-analysis; predictive modeling; personalized medicine; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; PREDICTION; MODELS; HEALTH; RISK; ADENOCARCINOMA; RESECTION; THERAPY; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1097/MPA.0000000000001312
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
This review critically analyzes how machine learning is being used to support clinical decision-making in the management of potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines, electronic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Database were undertaken. Studies were assessed using the checklist for critical appraisal and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modeling studies (CHARMS) checklist. In total 89,959 citations were retrieved. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Three studies were Markov decision-analysis models comparing neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery. Three studies predicted survival time using Bayesian modeling (n = 1) and artificial neural network (n = 1), and one study explored machine learning algorithms including Bayesian network, decision trees, k-nearest neighbor, and artificial neural networks. The main methodological issues identified were limited data sources, which limits generalizability and potentiates bias; lack of external validation; and the need for transparency in methods of internal validation, consecutive sampling, and selection of candidate predictors. The future direction of research relies on expanding our view of the multidisciplinary team to include professionals from computing and data science with algorithms developed in conjunction with clinicians and viewed as aids, not replacement, to traditional clinical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:598 / 604
页数:7
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Abbod MF, 2009, EXPERT REV ANTICANC, V9, P867, DOI [10.1586/era.09.47, 10.1586/ERA.09.47]
  • [2] Abbod MF, 2006, ONCOL REP, V15, P1019
  • [3] Systematic reviews in health care - Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7306): : 224 - 228
  • [4] The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration
    Altman, DG
    Schulz, KF
    Moher, D
    Egger, M
    Davidoff, F
    Elbourne, D
    Gotzsche, PC
    Lang, T
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) : 663 - 694
  • [5] Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Vergouwe, Yvonne
    Royston, Patrick
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 : 1432 - 1435
  • [6] Neoadjuvant/Preoperative Gemcitabine for Patients with Localized Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies
    Andriulli, Angelo
    Festa, Virginia
    Botteri, Edoardo
    Valvano, Maria R.
    Koch, Maurizio
    Bassi, Claudio
    Maisonneuve, Patrick
    Di Sebastiano, Pierluigi
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 (05) : 1644 - 1662
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2015, SCIENTIFICWORLDJOURN, DOI DOI 10.1155/2015/212703
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2016, Digit. Med.
  • [9] [Anonymous], PANCR CANC UK POL BR
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2018, DEEP LEARNING CRITIC