Recurrence of pulmonary vein conduction and atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: A randomized trial of the ostial versus the extraostial ablation strategy

被引:92
|
作者
Nilsson, Brian
Chen, Xu
Pehrson, Steen
Kober, Lars
Hilden, Jorgen
Svendsen, Jesper H.
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Cardiol, Ctr Heart, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Biostat, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2006.05.029
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Both segmental ostial and circumferential extraostial pulmonary vein (PV) isolation have been proven effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the recurrence of AF and PV conduction after the 2 ablation strategies has never been compared in a randomized study. Methods A total of 100 consecutive patients (age 56 +/- 10; 71 men) with symptomatic AF (paroxysmal, 5 1; persistent, 49) were randomized to segmental ostial (n = 54) or circumferential extraostial (n = 46) PV isolation. A circular catheter positioned at the ostium of each target PV guided the ostial PV isolation. Extraostial PV isolation was performed by encircling the paired left and right PVs, respectively, guided by an electroanotomic mapping system. Results A total of 84% of the patients had recurrent AF after the first PV isolation procedure, showing 72% with AF and 12% with organized left atrial tachycardia. In patients undergoing reablation, all but 2 patients had recurrence of left atrium PV conduction (> 95%). During a mean follow-up of 12 months without antiarrhythmic medication, 57% of patients who underwent extraostial PV isolation were free of arrhythmia symptoms compared with 31% of patients who underwent ostial PV isolation (P <.05). This difference in success rate between the 2 ablation strategies was mainly seen in patients known with persistent AF (52% and 15%, respectively; P =.02) as opposed to patients with paroxysmal AF (65% and 46%, respectively; P = .26). Conclusions Overall, the more proximal, extraostial PV isolation was found to be superior to ostial PV isolation, especially in patients known with persistent AF. A high recurrence rate of 84% after a single complete PV isolation procedure was seen. At reablation, more than 95% had recurrence of left atrium PV conduction regardless of the procedure used, supporting the idea that complete PV isolation seems essential to prevent arrhythmia recurrences.
引用
收藏
页码:537.e1 / 537.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stepwise ablation approach versus pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Randomized controlled trial
    Faustino, Massimiliano
    Pizzi, Carmine
    Agricola, Tullio
    Xhyheri, Borejda
    Costa, Grazia Maria
    Flacco, Maria Elena
    Capasso, Lorenzo
    Cicolini, Giancarlo
    Di Girolamo, Enrico
    Leonzio, Luigi
    Manzoli, Lamberto
    HEART RHYTHM, 2015, 12 (09) : 1907 - 1915
  • [32] Circumferential ablation with pulmonary vein isolation in permanent atrial fibrillation
    Cheema, Aamir
    Dong, Jun
    Dalal, Darshan
    Marine, Joseph E.
    Henrikson, Charles A.
    Spragg, David
    Cheng, Alan
    Nazarian, Saman
    Bilchick, Kenneth C.
    Almasry, Ibrahim
    Sinha, Sunil
    Scherr, Daniel
    Halperin, Henry
    Berger, Ronald
    Calkins, Hugh
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 99 (10): : 1425 - 1428
  • [33] Stepwise approach ablation versus pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: randomized controlled trial
    Faustino, M.
    Agricola, T.
    Xhyheri, B.
    Costa, G. M.
    Leonzio, L.
    Di Girolamo, E.
    Pizzi, C.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 573 - 573
  • [34] Is pulmonary vein isolation still the cornerstone in atrial fibrillation ablation?
    Bunch, T. Jared
    Cutler, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2015, 7 (02) : 132 - 141
  • [35] Pulmonary vein isolation and linear lesions in atrial fibrillation ablation
    Sheikh, Imran
    Krum, David
    Cooley, Ryan
    Dhala, Anwer
    Blanck, Zalmen
    Bhatia, Atul
    Nangia, Vikram
    Akhtar, Masood
    Sra, Jasbir
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (02) : 103 - 109
  • [36] Pulmonary vein isolation and linear lesions in atrial fibrillation ablation
    Imran Sheikh
    David Krum
    Ryan Cooley
    Anwer Dhala
    Zalmen Blanck
    Atul Bhatia
    Vikram Nangia
    Masood Akhtar
    Jasbir Sra
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2006, 17 : 103 - 109
  • [37] Pulmonary vein isolation alone versus pulmonary vein isolation with additional extensive ablation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation
    Junarta, Joey
    Dikdan, Sean J.
    Upadhyay, Naman
    Molin, Andrea
    Bodempudi, Sairamya
    Warner, Eric
    Joffe, Daniel
    Pang, Zachary
    Frisch, Daniel R.
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2022, 38 (04) : 589 - 597
  • [38] Impact of a prolonged interatrial conduction time for predicting the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of persistent atrial fibrillation
    Satoshi Higuchi
    Koichiro Ejima
    Morio Shoda
    Eri Yamamoto
    Yuji Iwanami
    Daigo Yagishita
    Nobuhisa Hagiwara
    Heart and Vessels, 2019, 34 : 616 - 624
  • [39] Impact of a prolonged interatrial conduction time for predicting the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of persistent atrial fibrillation
    Higuchi, Satoshi
    Ejima, Koichiro
    Shoda, Morio
    Yamamoto, Eri
    Iwanami, Yuji
    Yagishita, Daigo
    Hagiwara, Nobuhisa
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2019, 34 (04) : 616 - 624
  • [40] Repeat catheter ablation after very late recurrence of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation
    Stauffer, Niklas
    Knecht, Sven
    Badertscher, Patrick
    Krisai, Philipp
    Hennings, Elisa
    Serban, Teodor
    Voellmin, Gian
    Osswald, Stefan
    Sticherling, Christian
    Kuhne, Michael
    EUROPACE, 2024, 26 (05):