Recurrence of pulmonary vein conduction and atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: A randomized trial of the ostial versus the extraostial ablation strategy

被引:92
|
作者
Nilsson, Brian
Chen, Xu
Pehrson, Steen
Kober, Lars
Hilden, Jorgen
Svendsen, Jesper H.
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen Hosp, Rigshosp, Dept Cardiol, Ctr Heart, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Biostat, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ahj.2006.05.029
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Both segmental ostial and circumferential extraostial pulmonary vein (PV) isolation have been proven effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the recurrence of AF and PV conduction after the 2 ablation strategies has never been compared in a randomized study. Methods A total of 100 consecutive patients (age 56 +/- 10; 71 men) with symptomatic AF (paroxysmal, 5 1; persistent, 49) were randomized to segmental ostial (n = 54) or circumferential extraostial (n = 46) PV isolation. A circular catheter positioned at the ostium of each target PV guided the ostial PV isolation. Extraostial PV isolation was performed by encircling the paired left and right PVs, respectively, guided by an electroanotomic mapping system. Results A total of 84% of the patients had recurrent AF after the first PV isolation procedure, showing 72% with AF and 12% with organized left atrial tachycardia. In patients undergoing reablation, all but 2 patients had recurrence of left atrium PV conduction (> 95%). During a mean follow-up of 12 months without antiarrhythmic medication, 57% of patients who underwent extraostial PV isolation were free of arrhythmia symptoms compared with 31% of patients who underwent ostial PV isolation (P <.05). This difference in success rate between the 2 ablation strategies was mainly seen in patients known with persistent AF (52% and 15%, respectively; P =.02) as opposed to patients with paroxysmal AF (65% and 46%, respectively; P = .26). Conclusions Overall, the more proximal, extraostial PV isolation was found to be superior to ostial PV isolation, especially in patients known with persistent AF. A high recurrence rate of 84% after a single complete PV isolation procedure was seen. At reablation, more than 95% had recurrence of left atrium PV conduction regardless of the procedure used, supporting the idea that complete PV isolation seems essential to prevent arrhythmia recurrences.
引用
收藏
页码:537.e1 / 537.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recurrence of atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation
    Tse, HF
    Lau, CP
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (07) : 691 - 692
  • [2] Mechanisms of recurrent atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation by segmental ostial ablation
    Lemola, K
    Hall, B
    Cheung, P
    Good, E
    Han, J
    Tamirisa, K
    Chugh, A
    Bogun, F
    Pelosi, F
    Morady, F
    Oral, H
    HEART RHYTHM, 2004, 1 (02) : 197 - 202
  • [3] Recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after pulmonary vein isolation: is repeat pulmonary vein isolation enough? A prospective, randomized trial
    Fichtner, Stephanie
    Sparn, Korbinian
    Reents, Tilko
    Ammar, Sonia
    Semmler, Verena
    Dillier, Roger
    Buiatti, Alexandra
    Kathan, Susanne
    Hessling, Gabriele
    Deisenhofer, Isabel
    EUROPACE, 2015, 17 (09): : 1371 - 1375
  • [4] Recovered pulmonary vein conduction after atrial fibrillation ablation
    Chen, PS
    HEART RHYTHM, 2005, 2 (03) : 334 - 334
  • [5] Conduction recovery after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation
    Noguchi, H
    Kumagai, K
    Yasuda, T
    Ogawa, M
    Tojo, H
    Saku, K
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2005, 69 (01) : 65 - 68
  • [6] Relationship of ostial pulmonary vein scar with reduction in pulmonary vein size after atrial fibrillation ablation
    Thomas H Hauser
    Dana C Peters
    John Wylie
    Catherine Lau
    Mark E Josephson
    Warren J Manning
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 11 (Suppl 1)
  • [7] Pulmonary vein isolation alone versus pulmonary vein isolation with additional extensive ablation for atrial fibrillation
    Junarta, Joey
    Upadhyay, Naman
    Molin, Andrea
    Bodempudi, Sairamya
    Dikdan, Sean
    Warner, Eric
    Joffe, Daniel
    Pang, Zachary
    Frisch, Daniel
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (04) : 799 - 799
  • [8] Percutaneous Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
    Michaud, Gregory F.
    John, Roy
    CIRCULATION, 2011, 123 (20) : E596 - E601
  • [9] Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation - Segmental pulmonary vein ostial ablation versus left atrial ablation
    Oral, H
    Scharf, C
    Chugh, A
    Hall, B
    Cheung, P
    Good, E
    Veerareddy, S
    Pelosi, F
    Morady, F
    CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (19) : 2355 - 2360
  • [10] Is pulmonary vein isolation by segmental ostial ablation a correct approach for treatment of atrial fibrillation?
    Nademanee, Koonlawee
    HEART RHYTHM, 2006, 3 (09) : 1029 - 1030