Mobilizing European law

被引:36
|
作者
Conant, Lisa [1 ]
Hofmann, Andreas [2 ,3 ]
Soennecken, Dagmar [4 ,5 ]
Vanhala, Lisa [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Denver, Dept Polit Sci, Denver, CO USA
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Ctr European Res CERGU, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Dept Polit Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] York Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Adm, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] York Univ, Dept Social Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] UCL, Dept Polit Sci, London, England
关键词
European convention on human rights; European Union; law and politics; legal mobilization; LEGAL OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURES; LITIGATION STRATEGIES; JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE; MOBILIZATION; COURTS; POLITICS; EU; PARTICIPATION; INTEGRATION; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1080/13501763.2017.1329846
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The literature on European legal mobilization asks why individuals, groups and companies go to court and explores the impact of litigation on policy, institutions and the balance of power among actors. Surveying the literature we find that legal mobilization efforts vary across policy areas and jurisdictions. This article introduces a three-level theoretical framework that organizes research on the causes of these variations: macro-level systemic factors that originate in Europe; meso-level factors that vary nationally; and micro-level factors that characterize the actors engaged in (or disengaged from) litigation. We argue that until we understand more about how and why different parties mobilize law, it is difficult to respond to normative questions about whether European legal mobilization is a positive or negative development for democracy and rights.
引用
收藏
页码:1376 / 1389
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条