Contact underwater explosion response of metallic sandwich panels with different face-sheet configurations and core materials

被引:17
|
作者
Chen, Ganchao [1 ]
Cheng, Yuansheng [1 ]
Zhang, Pan [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Changhai [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Yanjie [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Haikun [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Naval Architecture & Ocean Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, State Key Lab Explos Sci & Technol, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] China Ship Sci Res Ctr, Wuxi 214082, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Maritime Def Technol Innovat Ctr, Wuxi 214082, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sandwich structure; Cellular materials; Witness plate; Underwater explosion; Protective performance; UNDEX; DYNAMIC-RESPONSE; PLATES; FOAM; FAILURE; STRAIN; DEFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.tws.2020.107126
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The dynamic response of polyurethane (PU) foam core sandwich panels subjected to contact underwater explosions (UNDEXs) was experimentally investigated in this paper. The investigation focused on the effect of facesheet configurations on the deformation/failure modes and protective performance of the target sandwich panels. Special attention was paid to discussing the relative performance and intrinsic mechanisms amongst PU foam core sandwich panels and other two groups of sandwich panels with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and aluminum (AL) foam cores. Multiple failure modes were exhibited by the post-tested specimens including petalling of the front face, fragment generation, petalling and Mode Itc of the back face, core perforation and global bending, as well as core-face debonding. Regardless of stand-off distances and core materials, a more efficient way to minimize the damage level of the target panels and the permanent deformation of witness plates is allocating more mass to the back face rather than the front one. The promising core material to resist the contact UNDEX is the PVC foam with a higher crushing strength when the impulse is relatively low. If the impulse possesses a high-level intensity enough to induce petalling failure of back faces, the AL foam with a higher perforation resistance would become the best option to avoid the generation of a back cap.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [41] Low-velocity impact response of sandwich cylindrical panels with nanotube-reinforced and metal face sheet in thermal environment
    Bayat, M. R.
    Mashhadi, M. Mosavi
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 122 (1258) : 1943 - 1966
  • [42] Mechanical Characteristics of Sandwich Structures with 3D-Printed Bio-Inspired Gyroid Structure Core and Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Laminate Face-Sheet
    Junaedi, Harri
    Abd El-baky, Marwa A.
    Awd Allah, Mahmoud M.
    Sebaey, Tamer A.
    POLYMERS, 2024, 16 (12)
  • [43] Dynamic response prediction of prototype from scale-down model for I-core sandwich panels subjected to internal explosion
    Chen, Changhai
    Liu, Ran
    Han, Zhengjun
    Cheng, Yuansheng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING, 2023, 174