Contact underwater explosion response of metallic sandwich panels with different face-sheet configurations and core materials

被引:17
|
作者
Chen, Ganchao [1 ]
Cheng, Yuansheng [1 ]
Zhang, Pan [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Changhai [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Yanjie [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Haikun [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Naval Architecture & Ocean Engn, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, State Key Lab Explos Sci & Technol, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] China Ship Sci Res Ctr, Wuxi 214082, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Maritime Def Technol Innovat Ctr, Wuxi 214082, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sandwich structure; Cellular materials; Witness plate; Underwater explosion; Protective performance; UNDEX; DYNAMIC-RESPONSE; PLATES; FOAM; FAILURE; STRAIN; DEFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.tws.2020.107126
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The dynamic response of polyurethane (PU) foam core sandwich panels subjected to contact underwater explosions (UNDEXs) was experimentally investigated in this paper. The investigation focused on the effect of facesheet configurations on the deformation/failure modes and protective performance of the target sandwich panels. Special attention was paid to discussing the relative performance and intrinsic mechanisms amongst PU foam core sandwich panels and other two groups of sandwich panels with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and aluminum (AL) foam cores. Multiple failure modes were exhibited by the post-tested specimens including petalling of the front face, fragment generation, petalling and Mode Itc of the back face, core perforation and global bending, as well as core-face debonding. Regardless of stand-off distances and core materials, a more efficient way to minimize the damage level of the target panels and the permanent deformation of witness plates is allocating more mass to the back face rather than the front one. The promising core material to resist the contact UNDEX is the PVC foam with a higher crushing strength when the impulse is relatively low. If the impulse possesses a high-level intensity enough to induce petalling failure of back faces, the AL foam with a higher perforation resistance would become the best option to avoid the generation of a back cap.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Large inelastic response of unbonded metallic foam and honeycomb core sandwich panels to blast loading
    Theobald, M. D.
    Langdon, G. S.
    Nurick, G. N.
    Pillay, S.
    Heyns, A.
    Merrett, R. P.
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2010, 92 (10) : 2465 - 2475
  • [22] DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF SANDWICH PANELS WITH FUNCTIONALLY GRADED ALUMINUM FOAM CORES SUBJECTED TO UNDERWATER EXPLOSION
    Zhang, Changzai
    Zhang, Pan
    Liu, Jun
    Pan, Jianqiang
    Zhao, Yanjie
    Cheng, Yuansheng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 35TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING , 2016, VOL 9, 2016,
  • [23] Blast resistance of metallic double arrowhead honeycomb sandwich panels with different core configurations under the paper tube-guided air blast loading
    Chen, Ganchao
    Cheng, Yuansheng
    Zhang, Pan
    Cai, Sipei
    Liu, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 201
  • [24] Dynamic response of metallic trapezoidal corrugated-core sandwich panels subjected to air blast loading - An experimental study
    Zhang, Pan
    Liu, Jun
    Cheng, Yuansheng
    Hou, Hailiang
    Wang, Chunming
    Li, Yong
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2015, 65 : 221 - 230
  • [25] Dynamic response and failure of PVC foam core metallic sandwich subjected to underwater impulsive loading
    Huang, Wei
    Zhang, Wei
    Ye, Nan
    Gao, Yubo
    Ren, Peng
    COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING, 2016, 97 : 226 - 238
  • [26] Numerical investigation on the effect of different face sheet materials and core designs on the ballistic response of sandwich structures under low-velocity impact
    Singh, Rupanshu
    Rashid, Faizan Mohammad
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 56 : 3520 - 3526
  • [27] Impact damage characteristics in reinforced woven natural silk/epoxy composite face-sheet and sandwich foam, coremat and honeycomb materials
    Ude, A. U.
    Ariffin, A. K.
    Azhari, C. H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING, 2013, 58 : 31 - 38
  • [28] The influence of core height and face plate thickness on the response of honeycomb sandwich panels subjected to blast loading
    Chi, Y.
    Langdon, G. S.
    Nurick, G. N.
    MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2010, 31 (04) : 1887 - 1899
  • [29] Low-velocity impact response of multilayer foam core sandwich panels with composite face sheets
    Zhu, Yefei
    Sun, Yuguo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 209 (209)
  • [30] Comparative study on the blast load response of woven and lattice core metallic sandwich panels
    Varghese, Riya Mary
    Varghese, Krupa Mary
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 65 : 1343 - 1347