Fuel stacking in India: Changes in the cooking and lighting mix, 1987-2010

被引:87
作者
Cheng, Chao-yo [1 ]
Urpelainen, Johannes [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
India; Fuel stacking; Lighting; Cooking; Household surveys; Energy access; ENERGY POVERTY; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; TRANSITION; CHOICE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2014.08.023
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
In the developing world, households often stack multiple fuels. In the case of India, they use both kerosene and electricity for lighting while cooking with both LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) and traditional biomass. Existing scholarship on fuel stacking largely relies on small surveys and does not investigate change over time. We leverage the nationally representative NSS (National Sample Survey) of India in 1987 and 2010, finding that fuel stacking is decreasing in lighting, as people substitute electricity for kerosene, but increasing in cooking, as LPG does not replace traditional biomass. We also exploit a two-stage statistical model to analyze individual household's decision of fuel stacking. The most important finding is that, while a high household income reduces fuel stacking for lighting, it no longer does so in 2010 for cooking. The main policy implication of the study is that much more aggressive efforts are needed to deal with problems associated with biofuels, such as indoor air pollution, than to induce the switch from kerosene to electricity. The statistical model offers a considerable improvement over existing alternatives in the literature on household energy access. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 317
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Energy poverty reduction by fuel switching. Impact evaluation of the LPG conversion program in Indonesia [J].
Andadari, Roos Kities ;
Mulder, Peter ;
Rietveld, Piet .
ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 66 :436-449
[2]   Woodfuels, livelihoods, and policy interventions:: Changing perspectives [J].
Arnold, JEM ;
Köhlin, G ;
Persson, R .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 34 (03) :596-611
[3]  
Bhagwati JagdishN., 2013, Why growth matters: How economic growth in India reduced poverty and the lessons for other developing countries
[4]  
Dreze J., 2002, India: Development and participation
[5]   Evolution of Statistics in India [J].
Ghosh, JK ;
Maiti, P ;
Rao, TJ ;
Sinha, BK .
INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 1999, 67 (01) :13-34
[6]   Fuel demand elasticities for energy and environmental policies:: Indian sample survey evidence [J].
Gundimeda, Harlpriya ;
Koehlin, Gunnar .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (02) :517-546
[7]   SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS AS A SPECIFICATION ERROR [J].
HECKMAN, JJ .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (01) :153-161
[8]   Factors determining household fuel choice in Guatemala [J].
Heltberg, R .
ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2005, 10 :337-361
[9]   Fuel switching: evidence from eight developing countries [J].
Heltberg, R .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (05) :869-887
[10]   HOUSEHOLD FUEL CHOICE IN ZIMBABWE - AN EMPIRICAL-TEST OF THE ENERGY LADDER HYPOTHESIS [J].
HOSIER, RH ;
DOWD, J .
RESOURCES AND ENERGY, 1987, 9 (04) :347-361