Limitations and Pitfalls of Using Family Letters to Communicate Genetic Risk: a Qualitative Study with Patients and Healthcare Professionals

被引:56
|
作者
Dheensa, Sandi [1 ]
Lucassen, Anneke [1 ,2 ]
Fenwick, Angela [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Clin Eth & Law, Southampton Gen Hosp, South Acad Block,Room AB 203,MP 801,Tremona Rd, Southampton SO16 6YD, Hants, England
[2] Univ Hosp Southampton NHS Fdn Trust, Wessex Clin Genet Serv, Southampton, Hants, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Family communication; Genomics; Inherited genetic conditions; INFORMATION; INTERVENTION; RELATIVES; MEMBERS; ETHICS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s10897-017-0164-x
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
European genetic testing guidelines recommend that healthcare professionals (HCPs) discuss the familial implications of any test with a patient and offer written material to help them share the information with family members. Giving patients these "family letters" to alert any relatives of their risk has become part of standard practice and has gone relatively unquestioned over the years. Communication with at-risk relatives will become an increasingly pressing issue as mainstream and routine practice incorporates broad genome tests and as the number of findings potentially relevant to relatives increases. This study therefore explores problems around the use of family letters to communicate about genetic risk. We conducted 16 focus groups with 80 HCPs, and 35 interviews with patients, recruited from across the UK. Data were analyzed thematically and we constructed four themes: 1) HCPs writing family letters: how to write them and why?, 2) Patients' issues with handing out family letters, 3) Dissemination becomes an uncontrolled form of communication, and 4) When the relative has the letter, is the patient's and HCP's duty discharged? We conclude by suggesting alternative and supplementary methods of communication, for example through digital tools, and propose that in comparison to communication by family letter, direct contact by HCPs might be a more appropriate and successful option.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 701
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] Intervention for Smokers through New Communication Technologies: What Perceptions Do Patients and Healthcare Professionals Have? A Qualitative Study
    Trujillo Gomez, Jose Manuel
    Diaz-Gete, Laura
    Martin-Cantera, Carlos
    Fabregas Escurriola, Mireia
    Lozano Moreno, Maribel
    Buron Leandro, Raquel
    Gomez Quintero, Ana Maria
    Luis Ballve, Jose
    Clemente Jimenez, Maria Lourdes
    Puigdomenech Puig, Elisa
    Casas More, Ramon
    Garcia Rueda, Beatriz
    Casajuana, Marc
    Mendez-Aguirre, Marga
    Garcia Bonias, David
    Fernandez Maestre, Soraya
    Sanchez Fondevila, Jessica
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09):
  • [22] Like soldiers on the front - a qualitative study understanding the frontline healthcare professionals' experience of treating and caring for patients with COVID-19
    Dagyaran, Ilkay
    Risom, Signe Stelling
    Berg, Selina Kikkenborg
    Hojskov, Ida Elisabeth
    Heiden, Malin
    Bernild, Camilla
    Christensen, Signe Westh
    Missel, Malene
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [23] Family and transplant professionals' views of organ recovery before circulatory death for imminently dying patients: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews and focus groups
    Zimmermann, Christopher J.
    Baggett, Nathan D.
    Taylor, Lauren J.
    Buffington, Anne
    Scalea, Joseph
    Fost, Norman
    Croes, Kenneth D.
    Mezrich, Joshua D.
    Schwarze, Margaret L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 19 (08) : 2232 - 2240
  • [24] Relatives' influence on the treatment of acutely critically ill patients in prehospital emergency medicine: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences and attitudes
    Gronlund, Ingeborg R.
    Gydesen, Christoffer
    Thomsen, Thordis
    Moller, Ann M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 131 (06) : 1014 - 1021
  • [25] Interest in a Mobile App for Two-Way Risk Communication: A Survey Study Among European Healthcare Professionals and Patients
    de Vries, Sieta T.
    Denig, Petra
    Ruiz, Carmen Lasheras
    Houyez, Francois
    Wong, Lisa
    Sutcliffe, Alastair
    Mol, Peter G. M.
    DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 41 (07) : 697 - 712
  • [26] Empowering healthcare professionals in West Africa-A feasibility study and qualitative assessment of a dietary screening tool to identify adults at high risk of hypertension
    Batubo, Nimisoere P.
    Nwanze, Nnenna M.
    Alikor, Chizindu A.
    Auma, Carolyn I.
    Moore, J. Bernadette
    Zulyniak, Michael A.
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (04):
  • [27] The difference in knowledge and concerns between healthcare professionals and patients about genetic-related issues: A questionnaire-based study
    Almomani, Basima A.
    Al-Sawalha, Nour A.
    Al-Keilani, Maha S.
    Aman, Hatem A.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (06):
  • [28] The impact of the intensive care unit family liaison nurse role on communication during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative descriptive study of healthcare professionals' perspectives
    Chen, Ruofei
    Truong, Mandy
    Watterson, Jason R.
    Burrell, Aidan
    Wong, Pauline
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 36 (01) : 127 - 132
  • [29] The Use of Physical Restraints on Geriatric Patients: Culture and Attitudes among Healthcare Professionals at Intermediate Care Hospitals in Majorca. A Qualitative Study Protocol
    Carrero-Planells, Alba
    Urrutia-Beaskoa, Ana
    Moreno-Mulet, Cristina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (14)
  • [30] "Are we not going too far?": Socio-ethical considerations of preimplantation genetic testing using polygenic risk scores according to healthcare professionals
    Siermann, Maria
    Valcke, Ophelia
    Vermeesch, Joris Robert
    Raivio, Taneli
    Tsuiko, Olga
    Borry, Pascal
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2024, 343