Technology enhanced assessment: Ottawa consensus statement and recommendations

被引:9
作者
Fuller, Richard [1 ]
Goddard, Viktoria C. T. [2 ]
Nadarajah, Vishna D. [3 ]
Treasure-Jones, Tamsin [4 ]
Yeates, Peter [5 ]
Scott, Karen [6 ]
Webb, Alexandra [7 ]
Valter, Krisztina [8 ]
Pyorala, Eeva [9 ]
机构
[1] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Christie Educ, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Sch Med, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Int Med Univ, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[4] Kubify, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Keele, Sch Med, Keele, Staffs, England
[6] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[7] Australian Natl Univ, Coll Hlth & Med, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[8] Australian Natl Univ, John Curtin Sch Med Res, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[9] Univ Helsinki, Ctr Univ Teaching & Learning, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Assessment; curriculum; medical education research; CLOSED-BOOK EXAMINATIONS; COMPARING OPEN-BOOK; HIGHER-EDUCATION; MOBILE DEVICES; STUDENTS; TIME; EXPERIENCES; REFLECTION; GENERATION; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1080/0142159X.2022.2083489
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Introduction In 2011, a consensus report was produced on technology-enhanced assessment (TEA), its good practices, and future perspectives. Since then, technological advances have enabled innovative practices and tools that have revolutionised how learners are assessed. In this updated consensus, we bring together the potential of technology and the ultimate goals of assessment on learner attainment, faculty development, and improved healthcare practices. Methods As a material for the report, we used the scholarly publications on TEA in both HPE and general higher education, feedback from 2020 Ottawa Conference workshops, and scholarly publications on assessment technology practices during the Covid-19 pandemic. Results and conclusion The group identified areas of consensus that remained to be resolved and issues that arose in the evolution of TEA. We adopted a three-stage approach (readiness to adopt technology, application of assessment technology, and evaluation/dissemination). The application stage adopted an assessment 'lifecycle' approach and targeted five key foci: (1) Advancing authenticity of assessment, (2) Engaging learners with assessment, (3) Enhancing design and scheduling, (4) Optimising assessment delivery and recording learner achievement, and (5) Tracking learner progress and faculty activity and thereby supporting longitudinal learning and continuous assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:836 / 850
页数:15
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]  
African Development Bank (ADB), 2017, ADB Briefs number 75, DOI [10.22617/ABF178615-2, DOI 10.22617/ABF178615-2]
[2]   Contract cheating in higher education: a systematic literature review and future research agenda [J].
Ahsan, Kamrul ;
Akbar, Suraiyah ;
Kam, Booi .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 47 (04) :523-539
[3]  
Amin Zubair, 2011, Med Teach, V33, P364, DOI 10.3109/0142159X.2011.565832
[4]   Remote versus on-site proctored exam: comparing student results in a cross-sectional study [J].
Andreou, Vasiliki ;
Peters, Sanne ;
Eggermont, Jan ;
Wens, Johan ;
Schoenmakers, Birgitte .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 21 (01)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1990, The Principles of Design
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2021, NHS EPORTFOLIOS
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ASSESSMENT LEARNING
[8]   Speaking the unspoken in learning analytics: troubling the defaults [J].
Archer, Elizabeth ;
Prinsloo, Paul .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (06) :888-900
[9]  
ARISTOVNIK A, 2020, SUSTAINABILITY-BASEL, V12, DOI DOI 10.3390/SU12208438
[10]  
Auxier B., 2019, 10 tech-related trends that shaped the decade