A framework for understanding the relationship between externally and internally directed cognition

被引:148
作者
Dixon, Matthew L. [1 ]
Fox, Kieran C. R. [1 ]
Christoff, Kalina [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Psychol, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Brain Res Ctr, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Externally directed cognition; Internally directed cognition; Lateral prefrontal cortex; Default mode network; Cognitive control; Mind wandering; Self-referential; Medial prefrontal cortex; ROSTRAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; MINDFULNESS-BASED THERAPY; BRAINS DEFAULT NETWORK; LONG-TERM-MEMORY; NEURAL MECHANISMS; WANDERING MIND; FRONTAL-CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; STORY COMPREHENSION; ASPERGER-SYNDROME;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.024
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Externally directed cognition (EDC) involves attending to stimuli in the external environment, whereas internally directed cognition (IDC) involves attending internally to thoughts, memories and mental imagery. To date, most studies have focused on the competition or trade-offs between these modes of cognition. However, both EDC and IDC include a variety of cognitive states that differ along multiple dimensions. These dimensions may influence the way in which EDC and IDC relate to each other. In this review, we present a novel framework that considers whether cognitive resources are oriented externally or internally, and also whether a given cognitive state involves intentional (i.e., voluntary) or spontaneous (i.e., involuntary) processing. Within this framework, we examine the conditions under which EDC and IDC are expected to either compete, or co-occur without interference. We argue that EDC and IDC are not inherently antagonistic, but when both involve higher levels of intentionality they are increasingly likely to compete, due to the capacity limitations of intentional processing. In contrast, if one or both involve spontaneous processing, EDC and IDC can co-occur with minimal interference given that involuntary processes are not subject to the same capacity constraints. A review of the brain regions implicated in EDC and IDC suggests that their neural substrates are partially segregated and partially convergent. Both EDC and IDC recruit the lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) during intentional processing, and may therefore compete over the processes and representational space it supports. However, at lower levels of intentionality, EDC and IDC rely on largely distinct neural structures, which may enable their co-occurrence without interference. The proposal that EDC and IDC can in some cases co-occur, provides a framework for understanding the complex mental states that underlie theory of mind, creativity, the influence of self-evaluative processing on cognitive control, and memory-guided attention. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 330
页数:10
相关论文
共 126 条
  • [1] Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration
    Addis, Donna Rose
    Wong, Alana T.
    Schacter, Daniel L.
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2007, 45 (07) : 1363 - 1377
  • [2] The balanced mind: the variability of task-unrelated thoughts predicts error monitoring
    Allen, Micah
    Smallwood, Jonathan
    Christensen, Joanna
    Gramm, Daniel
    Rasmussen, Beinta
    Jensen, Christian Gaden
    Roepstorff, Andreas
    Lutz, Antoine
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [3] Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region
    Allison, T
    Puce, A
    McCarthy, G
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (07) : 267 - 278
  • [4] Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
    Amodio, DM
    Frith, CD
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 7 (04) : 268 - 277
  • [5] Andrews-Hanna J. R., 2014, NEUROIMAGE
  • [6] The Brain's Default Network and Its Adaptive Role in Internal Mentation
    Andrews-Hanna, Jessica R.
    [J]. NEUROSCIENTIST, 2012, 18 (03) : 251 - 270
  • [7] Evidence for the Default Network's Role in Spontaneous Cognition
    Andrews-Hanna, Jessica R.
    Reidler, Jay S.
    Huang, Christine
    Buckner, Randy L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 104 (01) : 322 - 335
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2000, PRINCIPLES BEHAVIOUR
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2018, MINDFULNESS BASED CO
  • [10] Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex
    Aron, AR
    Robbins, TW
    Poldrack, RA
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2004, 8 (04) : 170 - 177