Quantitative comparison of methods for predicting the arrival of coronal mass ejections at Earth based on multiview imaging

被引:74
作者
Colaninno, R. C. [1 ]
Vourlidas, A. [1 ]
Wu, C. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Naval Res Lab, Space Sci Div, Washington, DC 20375 USA
关键词
coronal mass ejection; time of arrival; INTERPLANETARY EJECTA; 1; AU; GEOMAGNETIC STORMS; MAGNETIC CLOUDS; WHITE-LIGHT; SPACECRAFT; TRACKING; MISSION; TIMES; SHOCK;
D O I
10.1002/2013JA019205
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We investigate the performance of six methods for predicting the coronal mass ejection (CME) time of arrival (ToA) and velocity at Earth using a sample of nine Earth-impacting CMEs between March 2010 and June 2011. The CMEs were tracked continuously from the Sun to near Earth in multiviewpoint imaging data from STEREOSun-Earth Connection Coronal and Heliospheric Investigation (SECCHI) and SOHOLarge Angle and Spectroscopic Coronagraph (LASCO). We use the Graduate Cylindrical Shell model to estimate the three-dimensional direction and height of the CMEs in every image out to approximate to 200R. We fit the derived three-dimensional (deprojected) height and time (HT) data with six different methods to extrapolate the CME ToA and velocity at Earth. We compare the fitting results with the in situ data from the Windspacecraft. We find that a simple linear fit above a height of 50R gives the ToA with an error 6h for seven (78%) of the CMEs. For the full sample, we are able to predict the ToA to within 13h. These results are a half day improvement over past CME arrival time methods that only used SOHO LASCO data. We conclude that heliographic height-time measurements of the CME front made away from the Sun-Earth line and beyond the coronagraphic field of view are sufficient for reasonably accurate predictions of their ToA.
引用
收藏
页码:6866 / 6879
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2001, Robotica, DOI DOI 10.1017/S0263574700223217
  • [2] The large angle spectroscopic coronagraph (LASCO)
    Brueckner, GE
    Howard, RA
    Koomen, MJ
    Korendyke, CM
    Michels, DJ
    Moses, JD
    Socker, DG
    Dere, KP
    Lamy, PL
    Llebaria, A
    Bout, MV
    Schwenn, R
    Simnett, GM
    Bedford, DK
    Eyles, CJ
    [J]. SOLAR PHYSICS, 1995, 162 (1-2) : 357 - 402
  • [3] BURLAGA L, 1981, J GEOPHYS RES-SPACE, V86, P6673, DOI 10.1029/JA086iA08p06673
  • [4] Coronal mass ejections, interplanetary ejecta and geomagnetic storms
    Cane, HV
    Richardson, IG
    Cyr, OCS
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (21) : 3591 - 3594
  • [5] Reply to comment on "Coronal mass ejections, interplanetary ejecta and geomagnetic storms" by Gopalswamy et al.
    Cane, HV
    Richardson, IG
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (24)
  • [6] A statistical comparison of interplanetary shock and CME propagation models
    Cho, KS
    Moon, YJ
    Dryer, M
    Fry, CD
    Park, YD
    Kim, KS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2003, 108 (A12)
  • [7] A SELF-SIMILAR EXPANSION MODEL FOR USE IN SOLAR WIND TRANSIENT PROPAGATION STUDIES
    Davies, J. A.
    Harrison, R. A.
    Perry, C. H.
    Moestl, C.
    Lugaz, N.
    Rollett, T.
    Davis, C. J.
    Crothers, S. R.
    Temmer, M.
    Eyles, C. J.
    Savani, N. P.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 750 (01)
  • [8] The SOHO mission: An overview
    Domingo, V
    Fleck, B
    Poland, AI
    [J]. SOLAR PHYSICS, 1995, 162 (1-2) : 1 - 37
  • [9] Interplanetary acceleration of coronal mass ejections
    Gopalswamy, N
    Lara, A
    Lepping, RP
    Kaiser, ML
    Berdichevsky, D
    St Cyr, OC
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (02) : 145 - 148
  • [10] Comment on "Coronal mass ejections, interplanetary ejecta and geomagnetic storms" by H.V. Cane, I.G. Richardson, and O.C.St. Cyr
    Gopalswamy, N
    Manoharan, PK
    Yashiro, S
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (24)