Considering author sequence in all-author co-citation analysis

被引:33
作者
Bu, Yi [1 ]
Wang, Binglu [2 ]
Chinchilla-Rodriguez, Zaida [3 ]
Sugimoto, Cassidy R. [4 ]
Huang, Yong [5 ]
Huang, Win-bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Informat Management, 5 Yiheyuan Rd, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] Inst Polit & Bienes Publ IPP, Consejo Super Invest Cient CSIC, Madrid 28037, Spain
[4] Indiana Univ, Luddy Sch Informat Comp & Engn, Bloomington, IN 47408 USA
[5] Wuhan Univ, Sch Informat Management, Informat Retrieval & Knowledge Min Lab, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Author co-citation analysis; Co-citation analysis; Citation analysis; Scientometrics; Mapping knowledge domains; INFORMATION-SCIENCE; CITATIONS; 1ST; CREDIT; COLLABORATION; PATTERNS; METADATA; PROPOSAL; SYSTEM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102300
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Author co-citation analysis (ACA) is a commonly used method to map knowledge domains and depict scientific intellectual structures. Although all authors' information has been considered in previous studies, ACA does not distinguish credits of different collaborators within a team. Authors' sequence in a publication illustrates their contributions and specialty of research, which offers more information as inputs of ACA. This paper considers author sequence in ACA and proposes a sequence-based ACA method. By assigning various weight values to authors with different sequences, this proposed method considers distinct contributions of co-authors influencing the effect of ACA. Extra weight is given to corresponding authors, beyond their sequence, to acknowledge their additional contributions. Results of the empirical study based on the data from the field of Library and Information Science show many details on the visualization maps of the proposed methods, such as the number of sub-fields, the position of sub-fields, the position of authors, and clarity and interpretability of visualization maps. Meanwhile, the current paper proposes a novel framework of evaluating knowledge domain maps with both quantitative and qualitative facets.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient [J].
Ahlgren, P ;
Jarneving, B ;
Rousseau, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 54 (06) :550-560
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Measuring research: What everyone needs to know
[3]  
Avula Jayakumar, 2015, J Indian Soc Periodontol, V19, P258, DOI 10.4103/0972-124X.145782
[4]  
Bastian M., 2009, P 3 INT ICWSM C ICWS, V3, P361, DOI [10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937, DOI 10.1609/ICWSM.V3I1.13937, 10.13140/2.1.1341.1520]
[5]   The value and credits of n-authors publications [J].
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Osorio, Antonio .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2019, 13 (02) :540-554
[6]  
Bu Y, 2017, PRO INT CONF SCI INF, P916
[7]   Using the appearance of citations in full text on author co-citation analysis [J].
Bu, Yi ;
Wang, Binglu ;
Huang, Win-bin ;
Che, Shangkun ;
Huang, Yong .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2018, 116 (01) :275-289
[8]   Combining multiple scholarly relationships with author cocitation analysis: A preliminary exploration on improving knowledge domain mappings [J].
Bu, Yi ;
Ni, Shaokang ;
Huang, Win-Bin .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2017, 11 (03) :810-822
[9]   MACA: a modified author co-citation analysis method combined with general descriptive metadata of citations [J].
Bu, Yi ;
Liu, Tian-yi ;
Huang, Win-bin .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 108 (01) :143-166
[10]  
Caron E., 2014, In: Proceedings of the 2014 Science and Technology Indicators Conference, P79