Traction method versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms A randomized controlled trial

被引:12
|
作者
Kinoshita, Jun [1 ]
Iguchi, Mikitaka [1 ]
Maekita, Takao [1 ]
Wan, Ke [2 ]
Shimokawa, Toshio [2 ]
Fukatsu, Kazuhiro [3 ]
Ito, Daisaku [1 ]
Taki, Shinya [1 ]
Nishimoto, Masayuki [1 ]
Takao, Masaki [1 ]
Tabata, Yasuto [1 ]
Mukai, Yousuke [1 ]
Kitano, Masayuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Wakayama Med Univ, Dept Internal Med 2, 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama 6418509, Japan
[2] Wakayama Med Univ, Clin Support Ctr, Wakayama, Japan
[3] Wakayama Rousai Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Wakayama, Japan
关键词
early gastric cancer; EndoTrac; ESD; gastric epithelial neoplasm; traction; COUNTER TRACTION; CANCER; EMR; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000029172
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced therapeutic technique for en bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Although gastric ESD is minimally invasive and provides favorable outcomes, it is technically difficult and requires a long procedure time for dissection. The traction-assisted approach overcomes some of the difficulties of gastric ESD, but its ability to reduce the procedure time remains unclear. The traction-assisted approach using dental floss and a clip did not reduce procedure time in the total population, but it reduced procedure time for lesions limited to the greater curvature of the upper or middle of the stomach. Although the traction direction of the clip-with-line method may be limited to the oral side via the cardia, EndoTrac ESD may provide flexible traction at any time during the procedure. This prospective randomized control study has been designed to compare the efficacy and safety of EndoTrac and conventional gastric ESD. Methods/design: This multicenter, randomized control trial will enroll 150 patients at 2 hospitals in Japan undergoing EndoTrac or conventional ESD for gastric epithelial neoplasia. Patients with a single gastric epithelial neoplasm who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized to EndoTrac or conventional ESD. Patients will be randomized by a computer-generated random sequence with stratification by operator experience, tumor size, tumor location, and institution. The primary endpoint will be ESD procedure time, defined as the time from the start of the submucosal injection to the completion of resection. Other outcomes will include the rates of adverse events and pathological curability Discussion: The ability of EndoTrac ESD to reduce the long procedure time and/or adverse events observed with conventional ESD can not only reduce physical stress on the patient, but can also reduce length of hospital stay and medical costs. Reduced technical difficulty will contribute to the widespread adoption of this ESD technique worldwide.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] WATER-POCKET ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION VERSUS STANDARD ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION IN PATIENTS WITH SUPERFICIAL COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Harada, Hideaki
    Murakami, Daisuke
    Amano, Yuji
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB510 - AB510
  • [12] Routine mucosal closure with a detachable snare and clips after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric epithelial neoplasms: a randomized controlled trial
    Kim, B. W.
    Kang, B-K
    Lee, B-I
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2011, 26 : 56 - 56
  • [13] Effect of Routine Mucosal Closure After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Neoplasms: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lee, Bo-in
    Kim, Byung Wook
    Choi, Hwang
    Ji, Jeong-Seon
    Hwang, Sun Mee
    Chae, Hiun Suk
    Choi, Kyu-Yong
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (05) : AB105 - AB105
  • [14] Conventional Versus Traction Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Tumors: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Singh, Sahib
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Sharma, Neil
    Vinayek, Rakesh
    Dutta, Sudhir
    Kantsevoy, Sergey V.
    Le, Michelle
    Adler, Douglas G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 58 (10) : 1016 - 1021
  • [15] A learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric epithelial neoplasms
    Kakushima, N.
    Fujishiro, M.
    Kodashima, S.
    Muraki, Y.
    Tateishi, A.
    Omata, M.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 38 (10) : 991 - 995
  • [16] Randomized controlled trial comparing conventional and traction endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colon tumor (CONNECT-C trial)
    Ichijima, Ryoji
    Ikehara, Hisatomo
    Sumida, Yorinobu
    Inada, Taisuke
    Nemoto, Daiki
    Nakajima, Yuki
    Minagawa, Takeyoshi
    Sumiyoshi, Tetsuya
    Inoki, Kazuya
    Yoshida, Naohisa
    Inoue, Ken
    Fukuzawa, Masakatsu
    Minoda, Yosuke
    Tsutsumi, Koshiro
    Esaki, Mitsuru
    Gotoda, Takuji
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 35 (01) : 86 - 93
  • [17] The comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection with hybridKnife versus conventional knives for early gastric cancer: A single-center randomized controlled trial
    Cai, Ming-Yan
    Zhou, Ping-Hong
    Yao, Li-Qing
    Xu, Mei-Dong
    Zhong, Yun-Shi
    Zhang, Yi-Qun
    Chen, Wei-Feng
    Qin, Wen-Zheng
    Hu, Jian-Wei
    Li, Quan-Lin
    Qin, Xin-Yu
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 27 : 124 - 124
  • [18] Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional and underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms
    Nagata, Mitsuru
    Namiki, Masayuki
    Fujikawa, Tomoaki
    Munakata, Hiromi
    ENDOSCOPY, 2024,
  • [19] Causes of missed synchronous gastric epithelial neoplasms with endoscopic submucosal dissection
    Kim, Hyung Hun
    Kim, Ji Hyun
    Kim, Gwang Ha
    Choi, Myung-Kyu
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 28 : 47 - 47
  • [20] Useful of the Simplified Traction Method for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Neoplasms; Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Suzuki, Sho
    Gotoda, Takuji
    Kobayashi, Yoshiyuki
    Kono, Shin
    Kusano, Chika
    Fukuzawa, Masakatsu
    Moriyasu, Fuminori
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB257 - AB257