Ecosystem services along a management gradient in Michigan (USA) cropping systems

被引:65
作者
Syswerda, S. P. [1 ,2 ]
Robertson, G. P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, WK Kellogg Biol Stn, Hickory Corners, MI 49060 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Plant Soil & Microbial Sci, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ecosystem service; Climate change; Nitrate leaching; Organic agriculture; No-till; Diversity; AGRICULTURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.006
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
To assess tradeoffs and synergies among different services provided by major ecosystems in agricultural landscapes, we examined agricultural yield, aboveground net primary productivity, global warming impact, soil quality, water conservation, water quality, and plant diversity in eight replicated ecosystems along a management intensity gradient on the same soil type in SW Michigan, USA. Ecosystems included four annual grain systems in a maize-soybean-wheat rotation, two perennial crops (alfalfa and hybrid poplar trees), an early successional community, and a late-successional deciduous forest. The annual grain systems included tilled and no-till treatments both managed with conventional chemical inputs; and reduced input and biologically based treatments both managed with tillage for weed control and leguminous winter cover crops for nitrogen. Radar diagrams illustrated the suite of services provided by each system. We found 13 significant interactions between ecosystem service indicators, seven being positive and six negative. Numerous trade-offs with grain yield were found, suggesting that by focusing on grain yield in these systems, land managers may be neglecting other ecosystem services. Management of nitrogen fertilizer, cover crops, and tillage (no-till) were particularly important determinants for the delivery of multiple ecosystem services. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 35
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Modelling the supply of ecosystem services from agriculture: a minimum-data approach
    Antle, JM
    Valdivia, RO
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2006, 50 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [2] Antle JM, 2002, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V27, P1
  • [3] Basso B., 2006, Italian Journal of Agronomy, V1, P677
  • [4] Global consequences of land use
    Foley, JA
    DeFries, R
    Asner, GP
    Barford, C
    Bonan, G
    Carpenter, SR
    Chapin, FS
    Coe, MT
    Daily, GC
    Gibbs, HK
    Helkowski, JH
    Holloway, T
    Howard, EA
    Kucharik, CJ
    Monfreda, C
    Patz, JA
    Prentice, IC
    Ramankutty, N
    Snyder, PK
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2005, 309 (5734) : 570 - 574
  • [5] Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest
    Gelfand, Ilya
    Sahajpal, Ritvik
    Zhang, Xuesong
    Izaurralde, R. Cesar
    Gross, Katherine L.
    Robertson, G. Philip
    [J]. NATURE, 2013, 493 (7433) : 514 - +
  • [6] Livingston G.P., 1995, Biogenic Trace Gases: Measuring Emissions from Soil and Water, P14
  • [7] Maier Leo., 2001, MULTIFUNCTIONALITY A
  • [8] Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies
    Power, Alison G.
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 365 (1554) : 2959 - 2971
  • [9] Water use efficiency is not constant when crop water supply is adequate or fixed: The role of agronomic management
    Ritchie, Joe T.
    Basso, Bruno
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2008, 28 (03) : 273 - 281
  • [10] Ritchie JT, 1998, SYST APPR S, V7, P41