Life cycle assessment of bituminous pavements produced at various temperatures in the Belgium context

被引:27
|
作者
Anthonissen, Joke [1 ]
Braet, Johan [2 ]
Van den Bergh, Wim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Fac Appl Engn Sci, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Fac Appl Econ Sci, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Life cycle assessment (LCA); Warm mix asphalt (WMA); Hot mix asphalt (HMA); Additives; Sensitivity analysis; Contribution analysis; WARM MIX ASPHALT; RECLAIMED ASPHALT; ROAD; LCA; CONSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.trd.2015.10.011
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Bituminous mixture is the premier material for road construction in Belgium. Innovative technologies to improve energy efficiency of pavement constructions are necessary. Warm mix asphalt may provide significant energy savings to the asphalt industry, but the environmental impact of the total life cycle has to be investigated. The use of additives may counteract the reduced environmental impact due to energy savings. This paper presents the results of an environmental impact assessment of four wearing course test sections. Using life cycle assessment, hot mix asphalt is compared to a cold asphalt mix with emulsion and warm mix asphalt with two types of additives: a synthetic zeolite and an organic Fischer-Tropsch wax. Neither hot nor warm mix asphalt could be preferred based on the results of this study, because the additive has a major influence on the environmental results. It was seen that the production of bitumen, the transport and energy in order to generate heat mainly contribute to the total environmental impact. The results from the sensitivity analyses show that the total environmental impact of the life of the pavement can vary significantly based on the choice of the specific data source and service life. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 317
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life Cycle Assessment of Ethanol Produced from Wheat Straw
    Roy, Poritosh
    Dutta, Animesh
    JOURNAL OF BIOBASED MATERIALS AND BIOENERGY, 2012, 6 (03) : 276 - 282
  • [32] Environmental life-cycle assessment of various dairy products
    Djekic, Ilija
    Miocinovic, Jelena
    Tomasevic, Igor
    Smigic, Nada
    Tomic, Nikola
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 68 : 64 - 72
  • [33] A Review on Life Cycle Assessment of Pavements in Brazil: Evaluating Environmental Impacts and Pavement Performance Integrating the International Roughness Index
    Wintruff, Natalia Cavero
    Fernandes Jr, Jose Leomar
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [34] Life cycle impact assessment of various waste conversion technologies
    Khoo, Hsien H.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (06) : 1892 - 1900
  • [35] A life-cycle assessment (LCA) study on the various recycle routes of PET bottles
    Song, HS
    Moon, KS
    Hyun, JC
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 16 (02) : 202 - 207
  • [36] A Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) study on the various recycle routes of pet bottles
    Hyun-Seob Song
    Kwang-seek Moon
    Jae Chun Hyun
    Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 1999, 16 : 202 - 207
  • [37] Comparative life cycle assessment of warm mix technologies in asphalt rubber pavements with uncertainty analysis
    Cao, Ruijun
    Leng, Zhen
    Yu, Huayuang
    Hsu, Shu-Chien
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 147 : 137 - 144
  • [38] Life Cycle Assessment and Environmental Valuation of Biochar Production: Two Case Studies in Belgium
    Hamedani, Sara Rajabi
    Kuppens, Tom
    Malina, Robert
    Bocci, Enrico
    Colantoni, Andrea
    Villarini, Mauro
    ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (11)
  • [39] Life Cycle Assessment of Steel Produced in an Italian Integrated Steel Mill
    Renzulli, Pietro A.
    Notarnicola, Bruno
    Tassielli, Giuseppe
    Arcese, Gabriella
    Di Capua, Rosa
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (08)
  • [40] Comparative life cycle assessment of asphalt pavements using reclaimed asphalt, warm mix technology and cold in-place recycling
    Giani, Martina Irene
    Dotelli, Giovanni
    Brandini, Nicola
    Zampori, Luca
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2015, 104 : 224 - 238