Methodological considerations for the quantification of self-reported caffeine use

被引:26
|
作者
Addicott, Merideth A. [1 ]
Yang, Lucie L. [1 ]
Peiffer, Ann M. [1 ]
Laurienti, Paul J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Habitual caffeine use; Self-report; Methodology; Saliva assay; PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY; HABITUAL NON-CONSUMERS; DIETARY CAFFEINE; BLOOD-PRESSURE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; FLAVOR PREFERENCE; DRUG-USE; CONSUMPTION; HEAVY; WITHDRAWAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00213-008-1403-5
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The field of research regarding the effects of habitual caffeine use is immense and frequently utilizes self-report measures of caffeine use. However, various self-report measures have different methodologies, and the accuracy of these different methods has not been compared. Self-reported caffeine use was estimated from two methods (a retrospective interview of weekly caffeine use and a 7-day prospective diary; n = 79). These estimates were then tested against salivary caffeine concentrations in a subset of participants (n = 55). The estimates of caffeine use (mg/day) from the interview- and diary-based methods correlated with one another (r = 0.77) and with salivary caffeine concentrations (r = 0.61 and 0.68, respectively). However, almost half of the subjects who reported more than 600 mg/day in the interview reported significantly less caffeine use in the diary. Self-report measures of caffeine use are a valid method of predicting actual caffeine levels. Estimates of high caffeine use levels may need to be corroborated by more than one method.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 578
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Methodological considerations for the quantification of self-reported caffeine use
    Merideth A. Addicott
    Lucie L. Yang
    Ann M. Peiffer
    Paul J. Laurienti
    Psychopharmacology, 2009, 203 : 571 - 578
  • [2] Prenatal caffeine assessment: Fetal and maternal biomarkers or self-reported intake?
    Grosso, Laura M.
    Triche, Elizabeth
    Benowitz, Neal L.
    Bracken, Michael B.
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (03) : 172 - 178
  • [3] A comparison of self-reported alcohol use measures by early adolescents: Questionnaires versus diary
    Koning, Ina M.
    Harakeh, Zeena
    Engels, Rutger C. M. E.
    Vollebergh, Wilma A. M.
    JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE, 2010, 15 (03) : 166 - 173
  • [4] Influence of question structure on the recall of self-reported drug use
    Klungel, OH
    de Boer, A
    Paes, AHP
    Herings, RMC
    Seidell, JC
    Bakker, A
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (03) : 273 - 277
  • [5] Reliability of self-reported household pesticide use
    Fortes, Cristina
    Mastroeni, Simona
    Boffetta, Paolo
    Salvatori, Valentina
    Melo, Nidia
    Bolli, Simone
    Pasquini, Paolo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2009, 18 (05) : 404 - 406
  • [6] Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use Information Among Pregnant Women
    Garg, Mahek
    Garrison, Laura
    Leeman, Lawrence
    Hamidovic, Ajna
    Borrego, Matthew
    Rayburn, William F.
    Bakhireva, Ludmila
    MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2016, 20 (01) : 41 - 47
  • [7] Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use Information Among Pregnant Women
    Mahek Garg
    Laura Garrison
    Lawrence Leeman
    Ajna Hamidovic
    Matthew Borrego
    William F. Rayburn
    Ludmila Bakhireva
    Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2016, 20 : 41 - 47
  • [8] Involving adolescents with intellectual disability in the adaptation of self-reported subjective well-being measures: participatory research and methodological considerations
    Davison, J.
    Maguire, S.
    McLaughlin, M.
    Simms, V
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2022, 66 (07) : 628 - 641
  • [9] Accuracy of self-reported healthcare use in patients with osteoarthritis
    Cronan, TA
    Walen, HR
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 29 (10) : 2181 - 2184
  • [10] Self-reported inner speech use in university students
    Morin, Alain
    Duhnych, Christina
    Racy, Famira
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 32 (03) : 376 - 382