Prognostic Relevance of the Eighth Edition of TNM Classification for Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

被引:12
|
作者
Hau, Hans-Michael [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meyer, Felix [1 ]
Jahn, Nora [4 ]
Rademacher, Sebastian [1 ]
Sucher, Robert [1 ]
Seehofer, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leipzig, Dept Visceral Transplantat Vasc & Thorac Surg, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Dept Visceral Thorac & Vasc Surg, Univ Hosp, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Med Carl Gustav Carus, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Leipzig, Dept Anesthesiol, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
perihilar cholangiocarcinoma; Klatskin tumor; liver resection; TNM classification; 8th edition; AJCC; prognostic model; METASTATIC LYMPH-NODES; HILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; WESTERN CENTERS; CANCER; SURVIVAL; DISSECTION; CARCINOMA; OUTCOMES; EASTERN;
D O I
10.3390/jcm9103152
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: In our study, we evaluated and compared the prognostic value and performance of the 6th, 7th, and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in patients undergoing surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). Methods: Patients undergoing liver surgery with curative intention for PHC between 2002 and 2019 were identified from a prospective database. Histopathological parameters and stage of the PHC were assessed according to the 6th, 7th, and 8th editions of the tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification. The prognostic accuracy between staging systems was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) model. Results: Data for a total of 95 patients undergoing liver resection for PHC were analyzed. The median overall survival time was 21 months (95% CI 8.1-33.9), and the three- and five-year survival rates were 46.1% and 36.2%, respectively. Staging according to the 8th edition vs. the 7th edition resulted in the reclassification of 25 patients (26.3%). The log-rank p-values for the 7th and 8th editions were highly statistically significant (p <= 0.01) compared to the 6th edition (p = 0.035). The AJCC 8th edition staging system showed a trend to better discrimination, with an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52-0.84) compared to 0.61 (95% CI: 0.51-0.73) for the 7th edition. Multivariate survival analysis revealed male gender, age >65 years, positive resection margins, presence of distant metastases, poorly tumor differentiation, and lymph node involvement, such as no caudate lobe resection, as independent predictors of poor survival (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In the current study, the newly released 8th edition of AJCC staging system showed no significant benefit compared to the previous 7th edition in predicting the prognosis of patients undergoing liver resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Further research may help to improve the prognostic value of the AJCC staging system for PHC-for instance, by identifying new prognostic markers or staging criteria, which may improve that individual patient's outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 26
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project Proposals for the Revision of the M Descriptors in the Forthcoming Eighth Edition of the TNM Classification of Lung Cancer
    Eberhardt, Wilfried E. E.
    Mitchell, Alan
    Crowley, John
    Kondo, Haruhiko
    Kim, Young Tae
    Turrisi, Andrew, III
    Goldstraw, Peter
    Rami-Porta, Ramon
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10 (11) : 1515 - 1522
  • [42] A Comparison of Prognostic Schemes for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma
    Stefan Buettner
    Jeroen L. A. van Vugt
    Faiz Gani
    Bas Groot Koerkamp
    Georgios Antonios Margonis
    Cecilia G. Ethun
    George Poultsides
    Thuy Tran
    Kamran Idrees
    Chelsea A. Isom
    Ryan C. Fields
    Bradley Krasnick
    Sharon M. Weber
    Ahmed Salem
    Robert C. G. Martin
    Charles Scoggins
    Perry Shen
    Harveshp D. Mogal
    Carl Schmidt
    Eliza Beal
    Ioannis Hatzaras
    Rivfka Shenoy
    Shishir K. Maithel
    Alfredo Guglielmi
    Jan N. M. IJzermans
    Timothy M. Pawlik
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2016, 20 : 1716 - 1724
  • [43] Prognostic relevance of a novel TNM classification system for upper gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Pape, Ulrich-Frank
    Jann, Henning
    Mueller-Nordhorn, Jacqueline
    Bockelbrink, Angelina
    Berndt, Uta
    Willich, Stefan N.
    Koch, Martin
    Roecken, Christoph
    Rindi, Guido
    Wiedenmann, Bertram
    CANCER, 2008, 113 (02) : 256 - 265
  • [44] Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model to Predict Recurrence-Free Survival After Curative Resection for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study
    Liu, Zhi-Peng
    Chen, Wei-Yue
    Wang, Zi-Ran
    Liu, Xing-Chao
    Fan, Hai-Ning
    Xu, Lei
    Pan, Yu
    Zhong, Shi-Yun
    Xie, Dan
    Bai, Jie
    Jiang, Yan
    Zhang, Yan-Qi
    Dai, Hai-Su
    Chen, Zhi-Yu
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [45] Comparison of the University of Pittsburgh staging system and the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification for the prognostic evaluation of external auditory canal cancer
    Shinya Morita
    Takatsugu Mizumachi
    Yuji Nakamaru
    Tomohiro Sakashita
    Satoshi Kano
    Kimiko Hoshino
    Atsushi Fukuda
    Keishi Fujiwara
    Akihiro Homma
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2018, 23 : 1029 - 1037
  • [46] Comparison of the University of Pittsburgh staging system and the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification for the prognostic evaluation of external auditory canal cancer
    Morita, Shinya
    Mizumachi, Takatsugu
    Nakamaru, Yuji
    Sakashita, Tomohiro
    Kano, Satoshi
    Hoshino, Kimiko
    Fukuda, Atsushi
    Fujiwara, Keishi
    Homma, Akihiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 23 (06) : 1029 - 1037
  • [47] Poor Prognostic Factors in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Classified as Pathological Stage IB According to the Eighth Edition TNM Classification
    Takuwa, Teruhisa
    Hashimoto, Masaki
    Kuroda, Ayumi
    Nakamura, Akifumi
    Nakamichi, Toru
    Fukuda, Akihiro
    Matsumoto, Seiji
    Kondo, Nobuyuki
    Hasegawa, Seiki
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (06) : 1572 - 1579
  • [48] Appraisal of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
    Okuno, Masataka
    Ebata, Tomoki
    Yokoyama, Yukihiro
    Igami, Tsuyoshi
    Sugawara, Gen
    Mizuno, Takashi
    Yamaguchi, Junpei
    Nagino, Masato
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2016, 23 (10) : 636 - 642
  • [49] Suggestions for Improving Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Staging Based on an Evaluation of the Seventh Edition AJCC System
    Kwon, Wooil
    Jang, Jin-Young
    Chang, Ye Rim
    Jung, Woohyun
    Kang, Mee Joo
    Kim, Sun-Whe
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 19 (04) : 666 - 674
  • [50] Evaluation of the 7th edition of the TNM classification in patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Wang, Jia
    Wu, Nan
    Zheng, Qing-Feng
    Yan, Shi
    Lv, Chao
    Li, Shao-Lei
    Yang, Yue
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (48) : 18397 - 18403