Hierarchy, "Kreng Jai" and Feedback: A Grounded Theory Study Exploring Perspectives of Clinical Faculty and Medical Students in Thailand

被引:17
作者
Areemit, Rosawan S. [1 ]
Cooper, Cynthia M. [2 ,3 ]
Wirasorn, Kosin [4 ]
Paopongsawan, Pongsatorn [1 ]
Panthongviriyakul, Charnchai [1 ]
Ramani, Subha [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, 123 Mittraparb Rd, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
[2] Harvard Univ, Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[4] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
feedback; learning culture; medical student education; societal culture; Thailand; MULTISOURCE FEEDBACK; CULTURE; PERCEPTIONS; CREDIBILITY; REFLECTION; CHALLENGES; RESIDENTS; EMOTIONS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/10401334.2020.1813584
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Phenomenon:Institutional learning culture influences how feedback is provided, accepted, and acted upon. The Thai societal culture, characterized by strict hierarchy and collectivism, may have a significant impact on the learning culture and, therefore, feedback conversations between teachers and learners. This study explored: common approaches used by faculty to provide feedback to students; and faculty and student perspectives regarding sociocultural factors that impact feedback seeking, provision, and acceptance.Approach:Using a constructivist paradigm, we explored perspectives of clinical faculty and medical students at an academic medical center in Thailand using focus groups (students) and a focus group and individual interviews (faculty). Sessions were audiotaped, transcribed, and de-identified prior to analysis. Constant comparative analysis was performed on transcripts, focusing on perceived cultural factors that impacted feedback conversations.Findings:Thirty faculty participated in the study, four participated in a focus group, and 27 participated in individual interviews. Twenty-two medical students participated in four focus groups. We identified the following key themes, which could be grouped under three categories: (1) Faculty approaches to providing feedback (1.1) Feedback should be initiated by faculty. (1.2) Feedback is initiated primarily for deficit identification and correction. (2) Factors impacting students' feedback seeking and acceptance. (2.1) Students are willing to accept harsh feedback when it provides suggestions for improvement. (2.2) Feedback is most credible when faculty have direct knowledge of the student's effort. (2.3) Feedback seeking is considered a burden on teachers. (3) Cultural factors that influence feedback (3.1) Societal hierarchy perpetuates unidirectional top-down feedback. (3.2) Kreng jai (the balance between consideration for others and self-interests) affects feedback seeking and provision.Insights:Though the value of feedback on learning was emphasized by all participants, the hierarchical culture of Thai society was perceived to have a significant influence on feedback seeking, provision, and acceptance. Identifying and addressing societal as well as institutional cultural factors would be key in designing growth-enhancing feedback initiatives relevant to the local context. One size feedback training does not fit all.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 244
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[31]   Twelve tips for giving feedback effectively in the clinical environment [J].
Ramani, Subha ;
Krackov, Sharon K. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2012, 34 (10) :787-791
[32]   Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: perceptions of credibility and usefulness [J].
Sargeant, J ;
Mann, K ;
Ferrier, S .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2005, 39 (05) :497-504
[33]   Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use [J].
Sargeant, Joan ;
Mann, Karen ;
Sinclair, Douglas ;
Van der Vleuten, Cees ;
Metsemakers, Job .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2008, 13 (03) :275-288
[34]   Challenges in multisource feedback: intended and unintended outcomes [J].
Sargeant, Joan ;
Mann, Karen ;
Sinclair, Douglas ;
Van der Vleuten, Cees ;
Metsemakers, Job .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (06) :583-591
[35]   Facilitated Reflective Performance Feedback: Developing an Evidence- and Theory-Based Model That Builds Relationship, Explores Reactions and Content, and Coaches for Performance Change (R2C2) [J].
Sargeant, Joan ;
Lockyer, Jocelyn ;
Mann, Karen ;
Holmboe, Eric ;
Silver, Ivan ;
Armson, Heather ;
Driessen, Erik ;
MacLeod, Tanya ;
Yen, Wendy ;
Ross, Kathryn ;
Power, Mary .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2015, 90 (12) :1698-1706
[36]   Providing feedback: Exploring a model (emotion, content, outcomes) for facilitating multisource feedback [J].
Sargeant, Joan ;
Mcnaughton, Elaine ;
Mercer, Stewart ;
Murphy, Douglas ;
Sullivan, Patricia ;
Bruce, David A. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2011, 33 (09) :744-749
[37]   Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91 [J].
Stalmeijer, Renee E. ;
Mcnaughton, Nancy ;
Van Mook, Walther N. K. A. .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2014, 36 (11) :923-939
[38]   Modelling the Hofstee method reveals problems [J].
Tavakol, Mohsen ;
Dennick, Reg .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2014, 36 (02) :181-182
[39]   The "Educational Alliance" as a Framework for Reconceptualizing Feedback in Medical Education [J].
Telio, Summer ;
Ajjawi, Rola ;
Regehr, Glenn .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2015, 90 (05) :609-614
[40]   Believing is seeing: how people's beliefs influence goals, emotions and behaviour [J].
Teunissen, Pim W. ;
Bok, Harold G. J. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 47 (11) :1064-1072