Evaluation of dual-energy subtraction of digital mammography images under conditions found in a commercial unit

被引:24
作者
Brandan, ME [1 ]
Ramírez, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Fis, Mexico City 01000, DF, Mexico
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/51/9/014
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Radiological contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) is evaluated in subtracted images of microcalcifications in breast tissue. CNR is calculated for dual-kVp subtraction combining beams available in a Senographe 2000D, assuming single breast compression. Spectra were obtained from Boone et al (1997 Med. Phys. 24 1863-73), and the study was limited to lowest 25 kVMo/Mo and highest 40 kV Rh/Rh beams, for 2.58 x 10(-4) C kg(-1) (1R) total exposure. For a standard case combining 25 kVp Mo/Mo and 40 kVp Rh/Rh beams, predicted maximum CNR for 300 mu m calcification in 5 cm thick, 50% glandular, breast is about 1.2, below Rose's criterion for visualization. Total mean glandular doses are about 2.5 cGy for a standard case. The effect that input factors might have on predictions has been evaluated. Choice between alternative spectra can affect CNR by 50%. Assumed calcification composition leads to differences of 67% in calculated CNR, and assumed breast tissue composition can alter CNR by 45%; these results are weakly dependent on calcification or breast thickness, or on the assumed fraction of glandular tissue. CNR values are related to detected spectra effective energy. Calculations predict that above 37 kVp Mo/Mo beams are more energetic than Rh/Rh at the same kVp, due to beam hardening.
引用
收藏
页码:2307 / 2320
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Comparison of dual energy detector system performance
    Alvarez, RE
    Seibert, JA
    Thompson, SK
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (03) : 556 - 565
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1999, MAMMOGRAPHY QUALITY
  • [3] BREAST IMAGING - DUAL-ENERGY PROJECTION RADIOGRAPHY WITH DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY
    ASAGA, T
    CHIYASU, S
    MASTUDA, S
    MASTUURA, H
    KATO, H
    ISHIDA, M
    KOMAKI, T
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1987, 164 (03) : 869 - 870
  • [4] Glandular breast dose for monoenergetic and high-energy X-ray beams: Monte Carlo assessment
    Boone, JM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) : 23 - 37
  • [5] DUAL-ENERGY MAMMOGRAPHY - A DETECTOR ANALYSIS
    BOONE, JM
    SHABER, GS
    TECOTZKY, M
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1990, 17 (04) : 665 - 675
  • [6] Molybdenum, rhodium, and tungsten anode spectral models using interpolating polynomials with application to mammography
    Boone, JM
    Fewell, TR
    Jennings, RJ
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1997, 24 (12) : 1863 - 1874
  • [7] Evaluation of equipment performance, patient dose, imaging quality, and diagnostic coincidence in five Mexico City mammography services
    Brandan, ME
    Ruiz-Trejo, C
    Verdejo-Silva, M
    Guevara, M
    Lozano-Zalce, H
    Madero-Preciado, L
    Martín, J
    Noel-Etienne, LM
    Ramírez-Arias, JL
    Soto, J
    Villaseñor, Y
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 35 (01) : 24 - 30
  • [8] A METHOD FOR SELECTIVE TISSUE AND BONE VISUALIZATION USING DUAL ENERGY SCANNED PROJECTION RADIOGRAPHY
    BRODY, WR
    BUTT, G
    HALL, A
    MACOVSKI, A
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1981, 8 (03) : 353 - 357
  • [9] On the noise variance of a digital mammography system
    Burgess, A
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (07) : 1987 - 1995
  • [10] AN ENERGY SENSITIVE CASSETTE FOR DUAL-ENERGY MAMMOGRAPHY
    CHAKRABORTY, DP
    BARNES, GT
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (01) : 7 - 13