Treating patients across European Union borders An international survey in light of the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic

被引:2
作者
Adam, Elisabeth H. [1 ]
Flinspach, Armin N. [1 ]
Jankovic, Radmilo [2 ]
De Hert, Stefan [3 ]
Zacharowski, Kai [1 ]
机构
[1] Goethe Univ Frankfurt, Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Anaesthesiol Intens Care Med & Pain Therapy, Theodor Stem Kai 7, Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Nis, Clin Ctr Nis, Sch Med, Clin Anaesthesia & Intens Therapy, Nish, Serbia
[3] Univ Ghent, Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0000000000001423
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND In light of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, how resources are managed and the critically ill are allocated must be reviewed. Although ethical recommendations have been published, strategies for dealing with overcapacity of critical care resources have so far not been addressed. OBJECTIVES Assess expert opinion for allocation preferences regarding the growing imbalance between supply and demand for medical resources. DESIGN A 10-item questionnaire was developed and sent to the most prominent members of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC). SETTING Survey via a web-based platform. PATIENTS Respondents were members of the National Anaesthesiologists Societies Committee and Council Members of the ESAIC; 74 of 80 (92.5%), responded to the survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Responses were analysed thematically. The majority of respondents (83.8%), indicated that resources for COVID-19 were available at the time of the survey. Of the representatives of the ESAIC governing bodies, 58.9% favoured an allocation of excess critical care capacity: 69% wished to make them available to supraregional patients, whereas 30.9% preferred to keep the resources available for the local population. Regarding the type of distribution of resources, 35.3% preferred to make critical care available, 32.4% favoured the allocation of medical equipment and 32.4% wished to support both options. The majority (59.5%) supported the implementation of a central European institution to manage such resource allocation. CONCLUSION Experts in critical care support the allocation of resources from centres with overcapacity. The results indicate the need for centrally administered allocation mechanisms that are not based on ethically disputable triage systems. It seems, therefore, that there is wide acceptance and solidarity among the European anaesthesiological community that local medical and human pressure should be relieved during a pandemic by implementing national and international re-allocation strategies among healthcare providers and healthcare systems.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 347
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] The Italian health system and the COVID-19 challenge
    Armocida, Benedetta
    Formenti, Beatrice
    Ussai, Silvia
    Palestra, Francesca
    Missoni, Eduardo
    [J]. LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 5 (05) : E253 - E253
  • [2] Too Many Patients ... A Framework to Guide Statewide Allocation of Scarce Mechanical Ventilation During Disasters
    Biddison, E. Lee Daugherty
    Faden, Ruth
    Gwon, Howard S.
    Mareiniss, Darren P.
    Regenberg, Alan C.
    Schoch-Spana, Monica
    Schwartz, Jack
    Toner, Eric S.
    [J]. CHEST, 2019, 155 (04) : 848 - 854
  • [3] The health equity in all policies (HEiAP) approach before and beyond the Covid-19 pandemic in the Italian context
    Bucciardini, R.
    Contoli, B.
    De Castro, P.
    Donfrancesco, C.
    Falzano, L.
    Ferrelli, R.
    Giammarioli, A. M.
    Mattioli, B.
    Medda, E.
    Minardi, V.
    Minelli, G.
    Palmieri, L.
    Pasetto, R.
    Pizzi, E.
    Rossi, S.
    Venerosi, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [4] Triage Care of the Critically Ill and Injured During Pandemics and Disasters: CHEST Consensus Statement
    Christian, Michael D.
    Sprung, Charles L.
    King, Mary A.
    Dichter, Jeffrey R.
    Kissoon, Niranjan
    Devereaux, Asha V.
    Gomersall, Charles D.
    [J]. CHEST, 2014, 146 (04) : E61S - E74S
  • [5] Critical care triage
    Christian, Michael D.
    Joynt, Gavin M.
    Hick, John L.
    Colvin, John
    Danis, Marion
    Sprung, Charles L.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2010, 36 : S55 - S64
  • [6] Fair Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in the Time of Covid-19
    Emanuel, Ezekiel J.
    Persad, Govind
    Upshur, Ross
    Thome, Beatriz
    Parker, Michael
    Glickman, Aaron
    Zhang, Cathy
    Boyle, Connor
    Smith, Maxwell
    Phillips, James P.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (21) : 2049 - 2055
  • [7] Seasonal and pandemic influenza preparedness: Science and countermeasures
    Fauci, Anthony S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 194 : S73 - S76
  • [8] Expanding ICU facilities in an epidemic: recommendations based on experience from the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong and Singapore
    Gomersall, Charles D.
    Tai, Dessmon Y. H.
    Loo, Shi
    Derrick, James L.
    Goh, Mia Siang
    Buckley, Thomas A.
    Chua, Catherine
    Ho, Ka Man
    Raghavan, Geeta P.
    Ho, Oi Man
    Lee, Lay Beng
    Joynt, Gavin M.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 32 (07) : 1004 - 1013
  • [9] Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China
    Guan, W.
    Ni, Z.
    Hu, Yu
    Liang, W.
    Ou, C.
    He, J.
    Liu, L.
    Shan, H.
    Lei, C.
    Hui, D. S. C.
    Du, B.
    Li, L.
    Zeng, G.
    Yuen, K. -Y.
    Chen, R.
    Tang, C.
    Wang, T.
    Chen, P.
    Xiang, J.
    Li, S.
    Wang, Jin-lin
    Liang, Z.
    Peng, Y.
    Wei, L.
    Liu, Y.
    Hu, Ya-hua
    Peng, P.
    Wang, Jian-ming
    Liu, J.
    Chen, Z.
    Li, G.
    Zheng, Z.
    Qiu, S.
    Luo, J.
    Ye, C.
    Zhu, S.
    Zhong, N.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2020, 382 (18) : 1708 - 1720
  • [10] Hick JL, 2006, ACAD EMERG MED, V13, P223, DOI [10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.037, 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2006.tb01677.x]