Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Analysis of Swept-Ramp Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Unsteadiness at Mach 2

被引:29
作者
Vanstone, Leon [1 ]
Clemens, Noel T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Aerosp Engn & Engn Mech, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Aerosp Engn & Engn Mech, Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
LOW-FREQUENCY UNSTEADINESS; MODEL-REDUCTION; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.2514/1.J057874
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This study investigates the large-scale unsteadiness of the 3D shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction generated by a 22.5 degrees compression ramp with 30 degrees sweep in a Mach 2 flow. This study extends previous work to examine the possible unsteadiness mechanisms of the separation line in differing frequency bands. This is achieved through ensemble averaging and lower-order proper orthogonal decomposition reconstructions that are targeted to extract certain physical processes. Unsteadiness is examined within three frequency bands: low frequency (St<0.01), midfrequency (0.01 < St < 0.1), and high frequency (St > 0.1). Each frequency band contains a very similar degree of kinetic energy (similar to 30%) and likely contributes equally to the movement of the separation line. The low- and midfrequency unsteadiness of the separation line continues to show a strong correlation with the inflowing boundary-layer velocity, with boundary-layer superstructures driving the midfrequency unsteadiness. The high-frequency unsteadiness appears related to coherent structures within the separation region, which form in alternating pairs of high- and low-velocity deficit and appear to cause the separation line to ripple as they travel with the cross-flow. The frequency of this type of unsteadiness is dependent on the cross-flow velocities and the size of the separation structures, a finding that agrees with the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:3395 / 3409
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Adler M., 2017, 55 AIAA AEROSPACE SC, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2017-0987
  • [2] Anderson Jr J.D., 2006, Hypersonic and High-Temperature Gas Dynamics, Vsecond, DOI DOI 10.2514/4.861956
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, IEEE PHOTONIC TECH L, V21, pC3, DOI [10.1109/LPT.2009.2024374, DOI 10.1109/LPT.2009.2024374]
  • [4] Relationship between upstream turbulent boundary-layer velocity fluctuations and separation shock unsteadiness
    Beresh, SJ
    Clemens, NT
    Dolling, DS
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2002, 40 (12) : 2412 - 2422
  • [5] Low-Frequency Unsteadiness of Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions
    Clemens, Noel T.
    Narayanaswamy, Venkateswaran
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 46, 2014, 46 : 469 - 492
  • [6] Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research: What next?
    Dolling, DS
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2001, 39 (08) : 1517 - 1531
  • [7] UNSTEADY WAVE STRUCTURE NEAR SEPARATION IN A MACH-5 COMPRESSION RAMP INTERACTION
    ERENGIL, ME
    DOLLING, DS
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1991, 29 (05) : 728 - 735
  • [8] STRUCTURE OF A TURBULENT DOUBLE-FIN INTERACTION AT MACH-4
    GAITONDE, D
    SHANG, JS
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1995, 33 (12) : 2250 - 2258
  • [9] STRUCTURE OF A DOUBLE-FIN TURBULENT INTERACTION AT HIGH-SPEED
    GAITONDE, D
    SHANG, JS
    VISBAL, M
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1995, 33 (02) : 193 - 200
  • [10] Three-dimensional turbulent interactions caused by asymmetric crossing-shock configurations
    Gaitonde, DV
    Shang, JS
    Garrison, TJ
    Zheltovodov, AA
    Maksimov, AI
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 1999, 37 (12) : 1602 - 1608