Proper Orthogonal Decomposition Analysis of Swept-Ramp Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Unsteadiness at Mach 2

被引:35
作者
Vanstone, Leon [1 ]
Clemens, Noel T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Aerosp Engn & Engn Mech, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Aerosp Engn & Engn Mech, Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
LOW-FREQUENCY UNSTEADINESS; MODEL-REDUCTION; SEPARATION;
D O I
10.2514/1.J057874
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This study investigates the large-scale unsteadiness of the 3D shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction generated by a 22.5 degrees compression ramp with 30 degrees sweep in a Mach 2 flow. This study extends previous work to examine the possible unsteadiness mechanisms of the separation line in differing frequency bands. This is achieved through ensemble averaging and lower-order proper orthogonal decomposition reconstructions that are targeted to extract certain physical processes. Unsteadiness is examined within three frequency bands: low frequency (St<0.01), midfrequency (0.01 < St < 0.1), and high frequency (St > 0.1). Each frequency band contains a very similar degree of kinetic energy (similar to 30%) and likely contributes equally to the movement of the separation line. The low- and midfrequency unsteadiness of the separation line continues to show a strong correlation with the inflowing boundary-layer velocity, with boundary-layer superstructures driving the midfrequency unsteadiness. The high-frequency unsteadiness appears related to coherent structures within the separation region, which form in alternating pairs of high- and low-velocity deficit and appear to cause the separation line to ripple as they travel with the cross-flow. The frequency of this type of unsteadiness is dependent on the cross-flow velocities and the size of the separation structures, a finding that agrees with the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:3395 / 3409
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Adler M., 2017, 55 AIAA AEROSPACE SC, DOI DOI 10.2514/6.2017-0987
[2]  
Anderson Jr J.D., 2006, Hypersonic and High-Temperature Gas Dynamics, Vsecond, DOI DOI 10.2514/4.861956
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, IEEE PHOTONIC TECH L, V21, pC3, DOI [10.1109/LPT.2009.2024374, DOI 10.1109/LPT.2009.2024374]
[4]   Relationship between upstream turbulent boundary-layer velocity fluctuations and separation shock unsteadiness [J].
Beresh, SJ ;
Clemens, NT ;
Dolling, DS .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2002, 40 (12) :2412-2422
[5]   Low-Frequency Unsteadiness of Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions [J].
Clemens, Noel T. ;
Narayanaswamy, Venkateswaran .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 46, 2014, 46 :469-492
[6]   Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research: What next? [J].
Dolling, DS .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2001, 39 (08) :1517-1531
[7]   UNSTEADY WAVE STRUCTURE NEAR SEPARATION IN A MACH-5 COMPRESSION RAMP INTERACTION [J].
ERENGIL, ME ;
DOLLING, DS .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1991, 29 (05) :728-735
[8]   STRUCTURE OF A TURBULENT DOUBLE-FIN INTERACTION AT MACH-4 [J].
GAITONDE, D ;
SHANG, JS .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1995, 33 (12) :2250-2258
[9]   STRUCTURE OF A DOUBLE-FIN TURBULENT INTERACTION AT HIGH-SPEED [J].
GAITONDE, D ;
SHANG, JS ;
VISBAL, M .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1995, 33 (02) :193-200
[10]   Three-dimensional turbulent interactions caused by asymmetric crossing-shock configurations [J].
Gaitonde, DV ;
Shang, JS ;
Garrison, TJ ;
Zheltovodov, AA ;
Maksimov, AI .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1999, 37 (12) :1602-1608