Analysis of the effect of smoking on the buccal microbiome using next-generation sequencing technology

被引:27
作者
Karabudak, Sema [1 ]
Ari, Oguz [1 ]
Durmaz, Bengul [2 ]
Dal, Tuba [3 ]
Basyigit, Tugcan [3 ]
Kalcioglu, Mahmut Tayyar [4 ]
Durmaz, Riza [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Cent Res & Applicat Ctr, Ankara, Turkey
[2] Yuksek Ihtisas Univ, Dept Clin Microbiol, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Dept Clin Microbiol, Fac Med, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Medeniyet Univ, Dept Otolaryngol, Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
smoking; next-generation sequencing; metagenomic analysis; buccal microbiome; ORAL MICROBIOME; SUBGINGIVAL MICROBIOME; DIVERSITY; HEALTH; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1099/jmm.0.001003
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Purpose. This study aimed to investigate the effect of smoking on the buccal microbiome and to analyse the descriptive ability of each of the seven hypervariable regions in their 16S rRNA genes. Methodology. Microbiome compositions of 40 buccal swab samples collected from smokers (n = 20) and non-smokers (n = 20) were determined using 16S rRNA sequencing. Seven different 16S rRNA hypervariable regions (V2, V3, V4, V6-7, V8 and V9) in each sample were amplified using the Ion Torrent 16S Metagenomics kit and were sequenced on the Ion S5 instrument. Results. Seven hypervariable regions in the 16S rRNA gene were successfully sequenced for all samples tested. The data obtained with the V2 region was found to be informative but the consensus data generated according to a number of operational taxonomic unit reads gathered from all seven hypervariable regions gave the most accurate result. At the phylum level, no statistically significant difference was found between smokers and non-smokers whereas relative abundances of Veillonella atypica, Streptococcus australis, Prevotella melaninogenica, Prevotella salivae and Rothia mucilaginosa showed significant increases in the smoker group (P-adj=0.05). Alpha diversity results did not show a significant difference between the two groups; however, beta diversity analysis indicated that samples of smoker and non-smoker groups had a tendency to be clustered within themselves. Conclusion. The results of the current study indicate that smoking is a factor influencing buccal microbiome composition. In addition, sequencing of all seven hypervariable regions yielded more accurate results than those with any of the single variable regions.
引用
收藏
页码:1148 / 1158
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ION TORRENT ION 16S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, THERMO SCIENTIFIC GE
[3]  
Belstrom D, 2016, PLOS ONE, V11
[4]   Bacterial profiles of saliva in relation to diet, lifestyle factors, and socioeconomic status [J].
Belstrom, Daniel ;
Holmstrup, Palle ;
Nielsen, Claus H. ;
Kirkby, Nikolai ;
Twetman, Svante ;
Heitmann, Berit L. ;
Klepac-Ceraj, Vanja ;
Paster, Bruce J. ;
Fiehn, Nils-Erik .
JOURNAL OF ORAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 6
[5]   Analysis of pH-driven disruption of oral microbial communities in vitro [J].
Bradshaw, DJ ;
Marsh, PD .
CARIES RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (06) :456-462
[6]   The Impact of Smoking on Oral and Nasopharyngeal Bacterial Flora [J].
Brook, I. .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2011, 90 (06) :704-710
[7]  
Chaitali Parikh EB, 2018, RAPID 16S NEXT GENER
[8]   A detailed analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA gene segments for the diagnosis of pathogenic bacteria [J].
Chakravorty, Soumitesh ;
Helb, Danica ;
Burday, Michele ;
Connell, Nancy ;
Alland, David .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2007, 69 (02) :330-339
[9]  
CHAO A, 1984, SCAND J STAT, V11, P265
[10]   Exploring the oral microbiota of children at various developmental stages of their dentition in the relation to their oral health [J].
Crielaard, Wim ;
Zaura, Egija ;
Schuller, Annemarie A. ;
Huse, Susan M. ;
Montijn, Roy C. ;
Keijser, Bart J. F. .
BMC MEDICAL GENOMICS, 2011, 4