LITERATURE AND DICTATORSHIP: CULTURE OF THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY IN SEARCH OF IDEAL POWER ESSAY

被引:0
作者
Glebova, I. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci INION RAN, Inst Sci Informat Social Sci, Ctr Russian Studies, Moscow, Russia
来源
POLITEIA-JOURNAL OF POLITICAL THEORY POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIOLOGY OF POLITICS | 2022年 / 104卷 / 01期
关键词
Modenity; theomachy; revolution; cult of Peter the Great; dictatorship; development; leaderism; creators; victims;
D O I
10.30570/2078-5089-2022-104-1-162-182
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The end of the 19th - beginning of the 20th century is a watershed moment for Russia. It was the era of "theomachy", or getting rid of the former gods (authorities, restrictions, coercion and control), in politics, economy, science and culture. In this sense, the motto "Down with the autocracy!" is the political equivalent of the poets' slogan "Throw Pushkin off the ship of Modernity". Poets, like politicians, wanted to break out of the past by removing its linchpin - the tsar, the old power. Some intended to reestablish it, others - to rethink it Politicians sought their ideal in "geography" (the political structure of advanced, democratic Europe), poets - in culture. And they found it in Peter the Great - the revolutionary on the throne, the demiurge of St Petersburg's Russia. That cult, which was seemingly organic for that culture, concealed the expectations that can be politically deciphered as "the dictatorship of development". It was Peter's model of transformation (radical upheaval, a step from the past into the future, with the leader heading the process) that was adopted by the Russian culture as a normative. The revolution and the new ("October") world, with its eulogy of the future, dictatorship, and cult of the leader, have become the answer to the questions of the beginning of the century and their test. The article views revolution precisely as an experience (which, for all its intensity and tragic nature, has received insufficient reflection) that failed to have any impact on the subsequent political practice. At the same time, although the main goal of the study is political in nature, the author draws on literary, mostly poetic sources, showing how revolutionary practice (not only at the start, but also at the end of the century) highlights the extent to which the "irresponsible chatter" of poets was truly reflective in political and moral respects.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 182
页数:21
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, SEREBRJANNYJ VEK PIS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1912, POSHCHECHINA OBSHCHE
[3]  
Benua A., 1917, RECH
[4]  
Benua A., 1908, ZOLOTOE RUNO, P99
[5]  
Buldakov V. P., 2018, Trudy po rossievedeniiu, P23
[6]  
Bykov D. L., 2007, BORIS PASTERNAK
[7]  
Dvornichenko F.Yu, 2018, PROSHCHANIE S REVOLU
[8]   Celebrating (or Not) The Russian Revolution [J].
Fitzpatrick, Sheila .
JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HISTORY, 2017, 52 (04) :816-831
[9]  
Gaida F., 2003, LIBERALNAJA OPPOZITS
[10]  
Habermas J., 2003, FILISOFSKIJ DISKURS