Cervical cerclage and type of suture material: a survey of UK consultants' practice

被引:16
作者
Israfil-Bayli, F. [1 ]
Toozs-Hobson, P. [1 ]
Lees, C. [2 ]
Slack, M. [3 ]
Daniels, J. [4 ]
Vince, A. [4 ]
Ismail, K. M. K. [5 ]
机构
[1] Birmingham Womens Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Birmingham B15 2T, W Midlands, England
[2] Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, Dept Fetal Med, London, England
[3] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Urogynaecol, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Robert Aitken Inst, Birmingham Clin Trials Unit, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[5] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Sch Clin & Expt Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Cervical incompetence; monofilament/non-braided sutures; multifilament/braided sutures; preterm birth; 2ND TRIMESTER; ULTRASOUND; PREVENTION; TRIAL; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3109/14767058.2013.870551
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The main aim of the survey was to explore current practices with regards to cervical cerclage procedures amongst UK consultants with particular emphasis on the type of suture material used. Methods: An electronic survey of UK consultant members and fellows of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and who previously agreed to be contacted for survey purposes. Results: There were 261 respondents to the survey and 88% routinely performed cerclage. The majority performed the procedure between 12 and 16 weeks' gestation (88.7%; n = 180/203), following the McDonald technique (83.4%; n = 166/199) and using a braided suture material (86.6%; n = 175/202). Although only 27 of the 202 responders (13.4%) used a monofilament suture for cerclage (75%; n = 149/201) of clinicians stated that they were not sure what is the best suture material to be used. Conclusion: There is considerable variation in practice amongst Consultant obstetricians with regards to cervical cerclage. Although most respondents use the traditional braided suture material, a significant proportion of them were not sure what is the best suture material to use. The "gestation at delivery" rate was judged to be the most important outcome for a future study.
引用
收藏
页码:1584 / 1588
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Comparison of delayed absorbable suture v nonabsorbable suture for treatment of incompetent cervix
    Abdelhak, YE
    Sheen, JJ
    Kuczynski, E
    Bianco, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (04) : 250 - 252
  • [2] Alfirevic Z, 2012, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V4, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD008991.PUB2
  • [3] Alfirevic Z, 2010, GREEN TOP GUIDELINE
  • [4] Final results of the Cervical Incompetence Prevention Randomized Cerclage Trial (CIPRACT): Therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone
    Althuisius, SM
    Dekker, GA
    Hummel, P
    Bekedam, DJ
    van Geijn, HP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (05) : 1106 - 1112
  • [5] Bachmann DP, 2000, MARK RES, V11, P11
  • [6] Suture type and ultrasound-indicated cerclage efficacy
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Owen, John
    Hankins, Gary
    Iams, Jay D.
    Sheffield, Jeanne S.
    Perez-Delboy, Annette
    Wing, Deborah A.
    Guzman, Edwin R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (11) : 2287 - 2290
  • [7] Effect of suture material on outcome of cerclage in women with a dilated cervix in the 2nd trimester: Results from the expectant management compared to physical exam-indicated cerclage (EM-PEC) international cohort study
    Bernard, Leah
    Pereira, Leonardo
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Rust, Orion
    Mittal, Suneeta
    Daly, Sean
    Vaarasmaki, M.
    Cotter, Amanda
    Gomez, Ricardo
    Prasertcharoensuk, Witoon
    Chaithongwongwatthana, Surasith
    Tolosa, Jorge E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (06) : S103 - S103
  • [8] Prophylactic cerclage for the prevention of preterm delivery
    Ezechi, OC
    Kalu, BKE
    Nwokoro, CA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2004, 85 (03) : 283 - 284
  • [9] Ultrasound-indicated cerclage: Shirodkar vs. McDonald
    Hume, Heather
    Rebarber, Andrei
    Saltzman, Daniel H.
    Roman, Ashley S.
    Fox, Nathan S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (12) : 2690 - 2692
  • [10] Pregnancy outcome after elective cervical cerclage in relation to type of suture material used
    Israfil-Bayli, F.
    Toozs-Hobson, P.
    Lees, C.
    Slack, M.
    Ismail, K. M. K.
    [J]. MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 2013, 81 (01) : 119 - 121