Ethics and shared decision-making in paediatric occupational therapy practice

被引:11
作者
Delany, Clare [1 ,2 ]
Galvin, Jane [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Childrens Hosp Melbourne, Childrens Bioeth Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] La Trobe Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Occupat Therapy, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
关键词
Clinical ethics; occupational therapy; pediatrics; shared decision-making; INFORMED-CONSENT; CLINICAL ETHICS; CHILDREN; REHABILITATION; PHYSICIAN; ADOLESCENTS; DISABILITY; ENCOUNTER; BIOETHICS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.3109/17518423.2013.784816
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Sharing information and decisions with children and their parents is critical in pediatric rehabilitation. Although the ethical significance and clinical benefits of sharing decisions are established, approaches for implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice are still developing. Aim: To explore the ethical challenges of sharing information and decisions with one family in pediatric occupational therapy. Method: We used a single qualitative in-depth interview with an occupational therapist to examine the ethical dimensions of sharing decisions. Results: We found that asking what was ethically at stake in the information-sharing process, highlighted how timing and style of information sharing impacts on understanding and collaboration within the therapeutic relationship. Using ethics-based questions assisted in drawing out the complexity of implementing the ideals of sharing information and decisions in pediatric practice. Conclusion: Reflecting on ethical dimensions of communication with families assists to identify approaches to shared decision-making in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 354
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ALLIED HLTH PROFESSI
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT J QUAL METHODS
[3]   Medical ethics for children: applying the four principles to paediatrics [J].
Baines, P. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2008, 34 (03) :141-145
[4]   Multiple realities in a study of medical consultations [J].
Barry, CA .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2002, 12 (08) :1093-1111
[5]  
Baxter P, 2008, QUAL REP, V13, P544
[6]  
Beauchamp TL, 2001, PRINCIPLES OF BIOMED
[7]  
Braddock CH, 1997, J GEN INTERN MED, V12, P339, DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00057.x
[8]  
BRAZIER M, 2005, MED LAW REV, V13, P412
[9]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[10]   Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (05) :651-661