BREAST ELASTICITY IMAGING TECHNIQUES: COMPARISON OF STRAIN ELASTOGRAPHY AND SHEAR-WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY IN THE SAME POPULATION

被引:22
作者
Jia, WanRu [1 ]
Luo, Ting [1 ]
Dong, YiJie [1 ]
Zhang, XiaoXiao [1 ]
Zhan, WeiWei [1 ]
Zhou, JianQiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Sch Med, 197 Ruijin 2nd Rd, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Elasticity imaging techniques; Ultrasonography; Breast cancer; QUANTITATIVE ELASTOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND ELASTOGRAPHY; CLINICAL-USE; LESIONS; BENIGN; DIFFERENTIATION; MASSES; US; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.09.022
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
purpose was to compare the diagnostic performances of strain elastography (SE) and shear-wave elastography (SWE) in differentiating breast lesions by combining with conventional ultrasound (US). A total of 198 patients with 203 breast lesions underwent conventional US, SE and SWE examination using MyLab 90 and Aixplorer US systems. The SE parameters were SEscore, fat-to-lesion ratio, gland-to-lesion ratio, muscle-to-lesion ratio and SEmean, and the SWE parameters were Emax, Emean, Emin and Esd. Conventional US had the best diagnostic performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.896. Among all SE parameters, the AUCs of SEscore, fat-to-lesion ratio and SEmean were 0.802, 0.810 and 0.833. For SWE parameters, they were 0.845, 0.746 and 0.845, respectively, for Emax, Emean and Esd. When combined with US, the sensitivity and AUC of SWE seemed to be better than those of SE (96.55% vs. 93.10%, 0.958 vs. 0.947), but no statistically significant difference existed between them. (E-mail: zhousu30@126.com) (C) 2020 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 113
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2009, J Ultrasound Med, V28, P105
[2]   Breast Lesions: Quantitative Elastography with Supersonic Shear Imaging-Preliminary Results [J].
Athanasiou, Alexandra ;
Tardivon, Anne ;
Tanter, Mickael ;
Sigal-Zafrani, Brigitte ;
Bercoff, Jeremy ;
Eux, Thomas Deffi ;
Gennisson, Jean-Luc ;
Fink, Mathias ;
Neuenschwander, Sylvia .
RADIOLOGY, 2010, 256 (01) :297-303
[3]   Shear-Wave Elastography of the Breast: Value of a Quality Measure and Comparison with Strain Elastography [J].
Barr, Richard G. ;
Zhang, Zheng .
RADIOLOGY, 2015, 275 (01) :45-53
[4]   Shear Wave Imaging of the Breast Still on the Learning Curve [J].
Barr, Richard G. .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2012, 31 (03) :347-350
[5]  
Barr RG, 2019, ULTRASONOGRAPHY, V38, P93
[6]   Supersonic shear imaging: A new technique for soft tissue elasticity mapping [J].
Bercoff, J ;
Tanter, M ;
Fink, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2004, 51 (04) :396-409
[7]   Shear-wave Elastography Improves the Specificity of Breast US: The BE1 Multinational Study of 939 Masses [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Cosgrove, David O. ;
Dore, Caroline J. ;
Schaefer, Fritz K. W. ;
Svensson, William E. ;
Hooley, Regina J. ;
Ohlinger, Ralf ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Balu-Maestro, Catherine ;
Locatelli, Martina ;
Tourasse, Christophe ;
Cavanaugh, Barbara C. ;
Juhan, Valerie ;
Stavros, A. Thomas ;
Tardivon, Anne ;
Gay, Joel ;
Henry, Jean-Pierre ;
Cohen-Bacrie, Claude .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 262 (02) :435-449
[8]   Radiological appearances of papillary breast lesions [J].
Brookes, M. J. ;
Bourke, A. G. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 63 (11) :1265-1273
[9]   Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging [J].
Burnside, Elizabeth S. ;
Hall, Timothy J. ;
Sommer, Amy M. ;
Hesley, Gina K. ;
Sisney, Gale A. ;
Svensson, William E. ;
Fine, Jason P. ;
Jiang, Jinfeng ;
Hangiandreou, Nicholas J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 245 (02) :401-410
[10]   Comparison of Shear-Wave and Strain Ultrasound Elastography in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions [J].
Chang, Jung Min ;
Won, Jae-Kyung ;
Lee, Kyoung-Bun ;
Park, In Ae ;
Yi, Ann ;
Moon, Woo Kyung .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (02) :W347-W356