THE DIFFERENCE IN SPATIOTEMPORAL DYNAMICS BETWEEN MODUS PONENS AND MODUS TOLLENS IN THE WASON SELECTION TASK: AN EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL STUDY

被引:8
作者
Li, Bingbing [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Meng [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Luo, Junlong
Qiu, Jiang [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yijun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Educ, Key Lab Cognit & Personal SWU, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ, Sch Psychol, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
[3] Xinxiang Med Univ, Dept Psychol, Xinxiang 453003, Henan, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Normal Univ, Dept Psychol, Shanghai 200234, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
proposition testing; Wason selection task; P3b-like; LNC; NEURAL BASIS; TIME; CONDITIONALS; LATENCY; REVEAL; P300; ERPS;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.04.007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
High-density, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded to explore differences in spatiotemporal dynamics between modus ponens (MP) and modus tollens (MT) in the Wason selection task. Results showed that MP elicits a more positive P3b-like component than MT from 400 to 800 ms. MP appeared to occur earlier than MT in various stages of proposition testing, such as stimulus processing and response selection. ERP results showed that MT has a longer duration and more negative later negative component (LNC) than MP at 2000 ms. This result suggests that MT occupies more cognitive resources than MP in the final stages of proposition testing. The short and small left frontal LNC obtained by MP implies examination of the expectable conclusion, whereas the long and large left frontal LNC elicited by MT may be involved in the retention operation of the card in working memory from the monitoring and inspecting putative conclusion in the later stages of proposition testing. (C) 2014 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 182
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, MENTAL LOGIC, DOI [DOI 10.4324/9781410603005, 10.4324/9781410603005]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, THINK REASON, DOI [10.1080/135467898394247, DOI 10.1080/135467898394247]
[3]   The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? [J].
Baddeley, A .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (11) :417-423
[4]   Event-related brain potentials dissociate visual working memory processes under categorial and identical comparison conditions [J].
Berti, S ;
Geissler, HG ;
Lachmann, T ;
Mecklinger, A .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (02) :147-155
[5]   Disabling conditional inferences: An EEG study [J].
Bonnefond, Mathilde ;
Kaliuzhna, Mariia ;
Van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste ;
De Neys, Wim .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2014, 56 :255-262
[6]   Deduction electrified: ERPs elicited by the processing of words in conditional arguments [J].
Bonnefond, Mathilde ;
Van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 124 (03) :244-256
[7]   What MEG can reveal about inference making: The case of if...then sentences [J].
Bonnefond, Mathilde ;
Noveck, Ira ;
Baillet, Sylvain ;
Cheylus, Anne ;
Delpuech, Claude ;
Bertrand, Olivier ;
Fourneret, Pierre ;
Van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2013, 34 (03) :684-697
[8]   How pragmatic interpretations arise from conditionals: Profiling the Affirmation of the Consequent argument with reaction time and EEG measures [J].
Bonnefond, Mathilde ;
Van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste ;
Gougain, Marion ;
Robic, Suzanne ;
Olsen, Matthew D. ;
Weiss, Oshri ;
Noveck, Ira .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2012, 67 (04) :468-485
[9]   What's behind an inference? An EEG study with conditional arguments [J].
Bonnefond, Mathilde ;
Van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2009, 47 (14) :3125-3133
[10]  
Desmedt J E, 1980, Prog Brain Res, V54, P682, DOI 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)61690-8