Managing socio-ecological systems: who, what and how much? The case of the Banas river, Rajasthan, India

被引:17
作者
Everard, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ West England UWE, Coldharbour Lane,Frenchay Campus, Bristol BS16 1QY, Avon, England
关键词
SCIENCE; CATCHMENT; FRAMEWORK; ECONOMICS; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.cosust.2020.03.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Addressing socio-ecological linkages is essential for diagnosing and proposing solutions to complex sustainability challenges, such as river-basin management, climate adaptation and broader sustainability problems. 'Who?' is integral to an inclusive approach, 'What?' dimensions of supportive ecosystems are included, and 'How much?' of the value of ecosystem services informs management decisions? In complex systems, such as catchments, these questions have to be addressed within inclusive governance arrangements, shaping technology choices and affecting societal and ecosystem outcomes. Historic communal water stewardship in the Banas catchment (Rajasthan, India) balanced the recharge of groundwater from monsoon runoff with its exploitation for irrigation and other uses. However, contemporary mechanised extraction of groundwater, and dam-based and other transfer schemes moving water out-of-catchment to urban, agricultural and other intensive users, now favours influential sectors of society. These intensive water management measures also deplete groundwater, prioritising immediate benefits whilst undermining the vitality and functioning of supporting ecosystems. This creates a degenerative cycle within the socio-ecological system, though this may be reversed with the development of governance systems based on a systemic overview of whole-system functioning. Sustainable stewardship, as practiced historically, needs to be adapted to contemporary conditions by emphasising connections amongst all stakeholders, the foundational capital of overall catchment functioning, and net societal and ecosystem benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 25
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, J BIOECON, DOI DOI 10.1007/s10818-013-9167-3
[5]   Differing perceptions of socio-ecological systems: Insights for future transdisciplinary research [J].
Avriel-Avni, Noa ;
Dick, Jan .
RESILIENCE IN COMPLEX SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 60 :153-190
[6]   The biomass distribution on Earth [J].
Bar-On, Yinon M. ;
Phillips, Rob ;
Milo, Ron .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (25) :6506-6511
[7]   The development of water services and their interaction with water resources in European and Brazilian cities [J].
Barraque, B. ;
Johnsson, R. M. Formiga ;
Nogueira de Paiva Britto, A. L. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2008, 12 (04) :1153-1164
[8]   Groundwater rejuvenation in parts of India influenced by water-policy change implementation [J].
Bhanja, Soumendra N. ;
Mukherjee, Abhijit ;
Rodell, Matthew ;
Wada, Yoshihide ;
Chattopadhyay, Siddhartha ;
Velicogna, Isabella ;
Pangaluru, Kishore ;
Famiglietti, James S. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[9]   Dispossessing irrigators: Water grabbing, supply-side growth and farmer resistance in India [J].
Birkenholtz, Trevor .
GEOFORUM, 2016, 69 :94-105
[10]   The ecosystem services agenda:bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy [J].
Braat, Leon C. ;
de Groot, Rudolf .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2012, 1 (01) :4-15