Predicting Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection Risk and Related Risk Drivers in Nursing Homes: A Machine Learning Approach

被引:29
|
作者
Sun, Christopher L. F. [1 ,2 ]
Zuccarelli, Eugenio [1 ,3 ]
Zerhouni, El Ghali A. [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Jason [1 ,4 ]
Muller, James [5 ]
Scott, Karen M. [1 ]
Lujan, Alida M. [1 ]
Levi, Retsef [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, 100 Main St,Room E62-562, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Healthcare Syst Engn, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] MIT, Operat Res Ctr, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[4] MIT, Sch Engn, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
[5] Muller Consulting & Data Analyt LLC, Washington, DC USA
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Nursing homes; COVID-19; infection prevention; health policy; long-term care facility; risk modeling; machine-learning; COVID-19; DISPARITIES; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jamda.2020.08.030
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: Inform coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection prevention measures by identifying and assessing risk and possible vectors of infection in nursing homes (NHs) using a machine-learning approach. Design: This retrospective cohort study used a gradient boosting algorithm to evaluate risk of COVID-19 infection (ie, presence of at least 1 confirmed COVID-19 resident) in NHs. Setting and Participants: The model was trained on outcomes from 1146 NHs in Massachusetts, Georgia, and New Jersey, reporting COVID-19 case data on April 20, 2020. Risk indices generated from the model using data from May 4 were prospectively validated against outcomes reported on May 11 from 1021 NHs in California. Methods: Model features, pertaining to facility and community characteristics, were obtained from a self-constructed dataset based on multiple public and private sources. The model was assessed via out-of-sample area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity in the training (via 10-fold cross-validation) and validation datasets. Results: The mean AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of the model over 10-fold cross-validation were 0.729 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.690.0.767], 0.670 (95% CI 0.477.0.862), and 0.611 (95% CI 0.412-0.809), respectively. Prospective out-of-sample validation yielded similar performance measures (AUC 0.721; sensitivity 0.622; specificity 0.713). The strongest predictors of COVID-19 infection were identified as the NH's county's infection rate and the number of separate units in the NH; other predictors included the county's population density, historical Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services cited health deficiencies, and the NH's resident density (in persons per 1000 square feet). In addition, the NH's historical percentage of non-Hispanic white residents was identified as a protective factor. Conclusions and Implications: A machine-learning model can help quantify and predict NH infection risk. The identified risk factors support the early identification and management of presymptomatic and asymptomatic individuals (eg, staff) entering the NH from the surrounding community and the development of financially sustainable staff testing initiatives in preventing COVID-19 infection. (C) 2020 AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1533 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Control of infection in nursing homes: a risk-management approach
    East, J
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1999, 43 : S39 - S41
  • [2] Prediction of the risk of mortality in older patients with coronavirus disease 2019 using blood markers and machine learning
    Zhu, Linchao
    Yao, Yimin
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [3] Assessment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection and Mortality Rates Among Nursing Homes With Different Proportions of Black Residents
    Travers, Jasmine L.
    Agarwal, Mansi
    Estrada, Leah V.
    Dick, Andrew W.
    Gracner, Tadeja
    Wu, Bei
    Stone, Patricia W.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2021, 22 (04) : 893 - +
  • [4] Coronavirus disease 2019 and clinical research in US nursing homes
    Quinn, Charlene C.
    Adams, Alyce S.
    Magaziner, Jay S.
    Gurwitz, Jerry H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2021, 69 (07) : 1748 - 1751
  • [5] Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection as a Risk Factor for Infective Endocarditis
    Kumanayaka, Dilesha
    Mutyala, Monica
    Reddy, Dhinesh, V
    Slim, Jihad
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (05)
  • [6] Predicting systemic risk of banks: a machine learning approach
    Kumar, Gaurav
    Rahman, Molla Ramizur
    Rajverma, Abhinav
    Misra, Arun Kumar
    JOURNAL OF MODELLING IN MANAGEMENT, 2024, 19 (02) : 441 - 469
  • [7] A machine learning approach to predicting risk of myelodysplastic syndrome
    Radhachandran, Ashwath
    Garikipati, Anurag
    Iqbal, Zohora
    Siefkas, Anna
    Barnes, Gina
    Hoffman, Jana
    Mao, Qingqing
    Das Dascena, Ritankar
    LEUKEMIA RESEARCH, 2021, 109
  • [8] Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Womens Health Risk
    Anbu, Sharathkumar
    Sarmah, Bhaskarjit
    2017 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICACCS), 2017,
  • [9] Operational assessment of nursing homes at times of pandemic: an integrated DEA and machine learning approach
    Cosgun, Ozlem
    Umar, Amjad
    Delen, Dursun
    OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (04)
  • [10] Machine learning methodologies versus cardiovascular risk scores, in predicting disease risk
    Alexandros C. Dimopoulos
    Mara Nikolaidou
    Francisco Félix Caballero
    Worrawat Engchuan
    Albert Sanchez-Niubo
    Holger Arndt
    José Luis Ayuso-Mateos
    Josep Maria Haro
    Somnath Chatterji
    Ekavi N. Georgousopoulou
    Christos Pitsavos
    Demosthenes B. Panagiotakos
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18