Comparing the pregnancy rates of one versus two intrauterine inseminations (IUIs) in male factor and idiopathic infertility

被引:35
作者
Liu, Wei [1 ]
Gong, Fei [1 ]
Luo, Keli [1 ]
Lu, Guangxiu [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent S Univ, Inst Human Reprod & Stem Cell Engn, Changsha 410078, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
intrauterine insemination; male factor infertility; idiopathic infertility; prospective randomized study;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-005-9017-x
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Purpose : To compare the effectiveness of double IUI with single IUI in male factor and idiopathic infertility patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). Methods : A prospective randomized study of 1257 COH-IUI cycles was performed. Total 1270 patients with mild or moderate male factor infertility (n = 776) and idiopathic infertility (n = 494) were enrolled in this study, and 767 with male factor infertility and 490 with idiopathic infertility completed clomiphene citrate (CC)/human menopausal gonadotrophin (hMG) COH cycles and IUI. Categorized on the basis of the causes of infertility (male factor, M; idiopathic infertility, I), patients were randomized into one of the following groups: Single IUI group (M-1/I-1) received single insemination 34 h post hCG administration, and double IUI group (M-2/I-2) received two inseminations 18-24 and 36-48 h post hCG injection, respectively. Results : The overall pregnancy rates were 15.43%. Pregnancy rate for single and double IUI group was 11.06 and 19.87% (p < 0.05), respectively. There was a significant statistical difference in cycle fecundity between M-1 and M-2 group (11.34% vs. 24.93%, p < 0.05), and between I-2 and M-2 group (11.93% vs. 24.93%, p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between I-1 and I-2 (10.53% vs. 11.93%, p > 0.05). Conclusions : Double IUI increases the pregnancy rate significantly in patients with male factor infertility, and single IUI acts as efficient as double IUI in patients with idiopathic infertility.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 79
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Comparison of the effectiveness of single intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus double IUI per cycle in infertile patients [J].
Alborzi, S ;
Motazedian, S ;
Parsanezhad, ME ;
Jannati, S .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 80 (03) :595-599
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, WHO LAB MANUAL EXAMI, P4
[3]   Single versus double intrauterine insemination in stimulated cycles for subfertile couples: a systematic review based on a Cochrane review [J].
Cantineau, AEP ;
Heineman, MJ ;
Cohlen, BJ .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2003, 18 (05) :941-946
[4]   Timing intrauterine insemination either 33 or 39 hours after administration of human chorionic gonadotropin yields the same pregnancy rates as after superovulation therapy [J].
Claman, P ;
Wilkie, V ;
Collins, D .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 82 (01) :13-16
[5]  
DODSON WC, 1991, FERTIL STERIL, V55, P457
[6]   Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility [J].
Guzick, DS ;
Carson, SA ;
Coutifaris, C ;
Overstreet, JW ;
Factor-Litvak, P ;
Steinkampf, MP ;
Hill, JA ;
Mastroianni, L ;
Buster, JE ;
Nakajima, ST ;
Vogel, DL ;
Canfield, RE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (03) :177-183
[7]   For now, one well-timed intrauterine insemination is the way to go [J].
Guzick, DS .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 82 (01) :30-31
[8]   The effectiveness of ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of persistent infertility: a meta-analysis [J].
Hughes, EG .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (09) :1865-1872
[9]   Analysis of factors influencing pregnancy rates in homologous intrauterine insemination [J].
Ibérico, G ;
Vioque, J ;
Ariza, N ;
Lozano, JM ;
Roca, M ;
Llácer, J ;
Bernabeu, R .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 (05) :1308-1313
[10]   Clomiphene citrate induced ovulation and intrauterine insemination: effect of timing of human chorionic gonadotropin injection in relation to the spontaneous LH surge on pregnancy rates [J].
Madankumar, R ;
Tsang, J ;
Lesser, ML ;
Kenigsberg, D ;
Brenner, S .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2005, 22 (04) :155-159