Trauma rapid review process: efficient out-patient fracture management

被引:16
作者
Beiri, A. [1 ]
Alani, A. [1 ]
Ibrahim, T. [1 ]
Taylor, G. J. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leicester Royal Infirm, Univ Hosp Leicester NHS Trust, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Leicester, Leics, England
关键词
fracture; radiograph; musculoskeletal injury; out-patient; England; ACCIDENT; EMERGENCY; SERVICE;
D O I
10.1308/003588406X106513
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION Our hospital operates a consultant-led, rapid review process of X-rays and case notes of all musculoskeletal injury patients on a daily basis. This compares with other centres where patients are reviewed in out-patient fracture clinics soon after injury. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this consultant-led, rapid review process compared to standard consultant fracture clinics. PATIENTS AND METHODS A prospective study of the rapid review process over 4 weeks of all musculoskeletal injury patients was conducted. The total number of patients referred per day, time taken to review these patients X-rays and case notes, number of recalls and reason for recall were documented. This was compared to consultant-led fracture clinics, which included time taken to review patients. RESULTS A total of 797 patients were processed through the rapid review over 4 weeks: 53 (6%) patients were recalled, 32 (4%) for a change of management and 21 (2.6%) because of lack of information. The mean number of patients referred per day was 28 taking a mean of 28 min; thus the mean time to review one patient was 1.0 min. The mean number of patients recalled per day was two. The mean time taken to review a patient in a standard fracture clinic was 11 min. Therefore, the total time that would have taken to review 28 patients in a standard fracture clinic would be 308 min. CONCLUSIONS A consultant-led, rapid review process of all patients with musculoskeletal injury is a very efficient process. The rapid review process saves clinic time and resources, minimises delays in clinical decision-making and saves the patient an unnecessary visit to the outpatient department.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 411
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   VALUE OF RE-EXAMINING X-RAY FILMS OF OUTPATIENTS ATTENDING ACCIDENT SERVICES [J].
GALASKO, CSB ;
MONAHAN, PRW .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1971, 1 (5750) :643-&
[2]  
GOODWIN H, 1997, HLTH CARE RISK REPOR, P15
[3]   Using routine accident and emergency department data to describe local injury epidemiology [J].
Gorman, DR ;
Ramsay, LJ ;
Wilson, GS ;
Freeland, P .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 1999, 113 (06) :285-289
[4]   Diagnostic errors in an accident and emergency department [J].
Guly, HR .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2001, 18 (04) :263-269
[5]  
McLauchlan CAJ, 1997, J ACCID EMERG MED, V14, P295
[6]   Reduction of "callbacks" to the ED due to discrepancies in plain radiograph interpretation [J].
Preston, CA ;
Marr, J ;
Amaraneni, KK ;
Suthar, BS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 16 (02) :160-162
[7]   VALUE OF RADIOGRAPH AUDIT IN AN ACCIDENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT [J].
THOMAS, HG ;
MASON, AC ;
SMITH, RM ;
FERGUSSON, CM .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 1992, 23 (01) :47-50
[8]   Improving the quality of patient care: patient satisfaction with a nurse-led fracture clinic service [J].
Williams, SC ;
Hollins, D ;
Barden-Marshall, S ;
Harper, WM .
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2003, 85 (02) :115-116