A Comparative Study of Dynamic Hip Screw Versus Multiple Cannulated Compression Screw Fixation in Undisplaced Intracapsular Neck of Femur Fractures

被引:6
作者
Cullen, Samuel E. [1 ]
Sephton, Benjamin [1 ]
Malik, Isfand [1 ]
Aldarragi, Ameer [1 ]
Crossdale, Martin [1 ]
O'Connor, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Stepping Hill Hosp, Trauma & Orthopaed, Stockport, England
关键词
cannulated cancellous screw; dynamic hip screw fixation; neck of femur fracture; intracapsular fracture; fracture around hip; hips;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.31619
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Femoral neck fractures are common injuries. Although many studies have compared two-hole dynamic hip screw (DHS) versus multiple cannulated cancellous screw (CCS) fixation for undisplaced intracapsular fractured neck of femurs (NOF), there is no consensus on which surgical technique results in better outcomes. The aim of our study was to compare DHS and CCS for undisplaced NOFs. The primary outcomes were reoperation and mortality rates at one year postoperatively. Methodology A retrospective analysis was performed involving all patients who underwent fixation with DHS/CCS for an undisplaced intracapsular NOF at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020. All patients had a minimum follow-up time greater than one year. All patients underwent a standardised NOF protocol. Patients either underwent DHS or CCS fixation according to surgeon preference, and there was no randomisation to either group. Results A total of 41 patients underwent fixation with DHS compared to 32 who underwent CCS. The reoperation rate at one year was 9.8% in the DHS group compared to 6.3% in the CCS group. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.588). The one-year mortality rate was similar between groups at 22.0% and 21.9% in the DHS group and the CCS group, respectively (p = 0.994). Registrar-level surgeons performed 80.5% of DHS compared to 59.4% of CCS, and consultant surgeons performed 4.9% of DHS compared to 25% of CCS. Conclusions There was no significant difference in revision rates or complications seen between CCS and DHS. A significantly higher percentage of CCS fixations were performed by consultant-grade surgeons at our hospital compared to DHS. This study provides further data on the choice of fixation method for intracapsular fractures. It also reports on the grade of the operating surgeon at our unit, which may be a factor in the quality of fixation and ultimately reoperation rates.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Fracture fixation in the operative management of hip fractures (FAITH): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial [J].
Bhandari, Mohit ;
Devereaux, P. J. ;
Guyatt, Gordon ;
Thabane, Lehana ;
Walter, Stephen D. ;
Heetveld, Martin J. ;
Jeray, Kyle J. ;
Liew, Susan ;
Schemitsch, Emil H. ;
Tornetta, Paul, III ;
Della Rocca, Gregory J. ;
McCormack, Robert ;
Oliver, Todd M. ;
Segers, Michiel J. M. ;
Rangan, Amar ;
Richardson, Martin ;
Sprague, Sheila ;
Slobogean, Gerard P. ;
Scott, Taryn ;
Garibaldi, Alisha ;
Zhou, Qi ;
Heels-Ansdell, Diane ;
Viveiros, Helena ;
Zielinski, Stephanie M. ;
Van Lieshout, Esther M. M. ;
Johal, Herman ;
Hanusch, Birgit C. ;
Swiontkowski, Marc .
LANCET, 2017, 389 (10078) :1519-1527
[2]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[3]   Dynamic hip system blade versus cannulated compression screw for the treatment of femoral neck fractures: A retrospective study [J].
Chen, Chao ;
Yu, Li ;
Tang, Xin ;
Liu, Mo-zhen ;
Sun, Li-zhong ;
Liu, Changjian ;
Zhang, Zhen ;
Li, Chang-zhou .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2017, 51 (05) :381-387
[4]   LOW-ANGLE FIXATION IN FRACTURES OF THE FEMORAL NECK [J].
GARDEN, RS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1961, 43 (04) :647-663
[5]   Fixed angle devices versus multiple cancellous screws: What does the evidence tell us? [J].
Hoshino, C. Max ;
O'Toole, Robert V. .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2015, 46 (03) :474-477
[6]   Dynamic hip screw fixation versus multiple screw fixation for intracapsular hip fracture [J].
Jettoo, Prithee ;
James, Philip .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2016, 24 (02) :146-149
[7]   Dynamic hip screws versus cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Li, Lang ;
Zhao, Xue ;
Yang, Xiaodong ;
Tang, Xueyang ;
Liu, Ming .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
[8]   Sliding hip screws versus cancellous screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Shehata, Mohamed S. A. ;
Aboelnas, Mohamed M. ;
Abdulkarim, Ali N. ;
Abdallah, Ahmed R. ;
Ahmed, Hussien ;
Holton, James ;
Consigliere, Paolo ;
Narvani, Ali A. ;
Sallam, Asser A. ;
Wimhurst, James A. ;
Imam, Mohamed A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2019, 29 (07) :1383-1393
[9]   A comparative study between multiple cannulated screws and dynamic hip screw for fixation of femoral neck fracture in adults [J].
Siavashi, Babak ;
Aalirezaei, Arash ;
Moosavi, Mersad ;
Golbakhsh, Mohammad Reza ;
Savadkoohi, Dariush ;
Zehtab, Mohammad Javad .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (10) :2069-2071
[10]   Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing dynamic hip screw and screw fixation for undisplaced subcapital hip fractures [J].
Watson, Adam ;
Zhang, Yu ;
Beattie, Sally ;
Page, Richard S. .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 83 (09) :679-683