Design boundary dynamics in infrastructure projects: Issues of resource allocation, path dependency and problem-solving

被引:13
作者
Zerjav, Vedran [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Bartlett Sch Construct & Project Management, London WC1E 7HB, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Design management; Boundary dynamics; Projects-as-practice; Infrastructure projects; Case studies; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; MANAGEMENT OFFICE; AS-PRACTICE; KNOWLEDGE; STRATEGY; OBJECTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.09.009
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Due to their complexity and high social impact, urban infrastructure projects often face challenges in managing the design decision-making processes across disparate disciplinary and knowledge domain boundaries. This paper introduces the notion of design boundary dynamics to describe the various cross-boundary coordination phenomena associated with organising the design of infrastructure projects. Taking a practice-based theoretical stance, the paper presents findings of qualitative research on the nature and genesis of design boundaries and their relation to the strategic decision-making on a transportation infrastructure project. Findings illustrate the entangled processes, through which the disciplinary, knowledge-domain and stage-based design boundaries emerged as a result of unfolding project practices. Paper identifies the key role of resource allocation constraints, path dependency of project decisions, and problem-solving nature of design and concludes with strategic recommendations for upstream operational integration to mitigate the impact of design boundary dynamics on infrastructure projects. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1768 / 1779
页数:12
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action
[2]   Project-as-Practice: In Search of Project Management Research That Matters [J].
Blomquist, Tomas ;
Hallgren, Markus ;
Nilsson, Andreas ;
Soderholm, Anders .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 41 (01) :5-16
[3]   From hero to hubris - Reconsidering the project management of Heathrow's Terminal 5 [J].
Brady, Tim ;
Davies, Andrew .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2010, 28 (02) :151-157
[4]  
Bresnen M., 2005, PROJ MANAG J, V36, P27
[5]   Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries [J].
Carlile, PR .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (05) :555-568
[6]   A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development [J].
Carlile, PR .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2002, 13 (04) :442-455
[7]   Temporal boundary objects in megaprojects: Mapping the system with the Integrated Master Schedule [J].
Chang, Artemis ;
Hatcher, Caroline ;
Kim, Jai .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (03) :323-332
[8]  
Cicmil S., 2006, International Journal of Project Management, V24, P675, DOI 10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.006
[9]  
Cicmil S., 2006, PROJ MANAG J, V37, P111
[10]  
Coase R.H., 1988, J LAW ECON ORGAN, V4, P3, DOI DOI 10.2307/765011