Towards an English School Theory of Hegemony

被引:49
作者
Clark, Ian [1 ]
机构
[1] Aberystwyth Univ, Aberystwyth, Dyfed, Wales
关键词
English School; hegemony; international society; legitimacy; primacy; UNITED-STATES; STABILITY; ECONOMY; ORDER;
D O I
10.1177/1354066109103136
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
English School (ES) writers have never developed a systematic account of hegemony, and most set out with assumptions that are 'anti-hegemonial'. The writings of Hedley Bull, in particular, appeared to reject any notion of a legitimate hegemony. However, a social theory of hegemony that emphasizes its consensual nature does appear consistent with other ES positions, particularly on the role of the Great Powers. This article excavates an ES theory of hegemony. It develops the argument for hegemony as a potential institution of international society, by analogy with the role of the Great Powers, and by extension of other ES principles. This stresses not just the material power of the Great Powers, but their degree of social recognition. Accordingly, it suggests that such a view of hegemony is no more paradoxical than, say, ES acceptance of war as a similar institution. This fills a major void in ES theory which otherwise has nothing of interest to say about international order in conditions of primacy.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 228
页数:26
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
ADAMSON, 1980, HEGEMONY REVOLUTION
[2]  
Agnew John., 2005, Hegemony: The new shape of global power
[3]  
ALDERSON K, 1999, H B INT SOC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ANARCHY LEGITIMACY P
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1987, Production, power, and world order: Social forces in the making of history
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1966, DIPLOMATIC INVESTIGA
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1984, EXPANSION INT SOC
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1966, DIPLOMATIC INVESTIGA
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1991, INT THEORY 3 TRADITI
[10]  
Argersinger Peter., 1995, The Limits of Agrarian Radicalism