Modification of Cutoff Values for HE4, CA125, the Risk of Malignancy Index, and the Risk of Malignancy Algorithm for Ovarian Cancer Detection in Jakarta, Indonesia

被引:22
作者
Winarto, Hariyono [1 ]
Laihad, Bismarck Joel [1 ]
Nuranna, Laila [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Fac Med, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet Gynecol, Jakarta, Indonesia
关键词
Ovarian cancer; CA125; human epidydimis protein 4; ROMA; RMI; tumor marker cutoff values; BIOMARKER PANELS; ASIAN WOMEN; PREDICTION; MULTIPLE; MARKERS;
D O I
10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.5.1949
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: CA125 and HE4 are used in calculating Risk of Malignancy Algorithm (ROMA); and Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI). However, studies showed that normal levels of CA125, and HE4 differ among ethnicities such as between Asians and Caucasians, thus affecting the accuracy of the RMI score and ROMA in predicting ovarian malignancy. This study aimed to determine whether new or modified cutoff values for Ca125, HE4, the RMI score, and ROMA resulted in a better prediction of malignancy compared with the previous or standard ones. Materials and Methods: Serum level of CA125 and HE4 from 128 patients with diagnosis of ovarian tumor that had been collected before surgery at Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital (CMH) in Jakarta from November 2010 until May 2011 were reviewed and analysed. The standard cutoff values of these biomarkers, RMI, and ROMA were modified by using logistic regression model. The modified cutoff values were compared to the standard cutoff values in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Results: The modified cutoff value of CA125, HE4, RMI score and ROMA were 165.2 U/mL, 103.4 pM, 368.7, 28/54. The sensitivity and specificity of the modified cutoff values CA125, HE 4, RMI score and ROMA in differentiating benign from malignant and borderline were 67% and 75,4%; 73.1% and 85.2%; 73.1% and 80.3%; and 77.6% and 86.9%. While the sensitivity and specificity of the standard cutoff value of CA125; HE4; RMI score; and ROMA were 91% and 24.6%; 83.6% and 65%; 80.6% and 65.6%; and 91.0% and 42.6%. The accuracy of modified cutoff values compared with standard cutoff values were: 71.2% vs 59.3%, 78.9% vs 75% vs, 76.5% vs 73.4%, and 82% vs 67.9%. Conclusions: The new or modified cutoff values of Ca125, HE4, RMI score and ROMA resulted in higher accuracy compared to the previous or standard ones, at the cost of reduced sensitivity.
引用
收藏
页码:1949 / 1953
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2008, WORLD CANC REPORT
  • [2] Gynecological cancer in Indonesia
    Aziz, M. Farid
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 20 (01) : 8 - 10
  • [3] Clinical Significance of Combined Detection of Serum Tumor Markers in Diagnosis of Patients with Ovarian Cancer
    Bian, Jing
    Li, Bo
    Kou, Xian-Juan
    Liu, Tian-Zhou
    Ming, Liang
    [J]. ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2013, 14 (11) : 6241 - 6243
  • [4] The use of HE4 in the prediction of ovarian cancer in Asian women with a pelvic mass
    Chan, Karen K. L.
    Chen, Chi-An
    Nam, Joo-Hyun
    Ochiai, Kazunori
    Wilailak, Sarikapan
    Choon, Aw-Tar
    Sabaratnam, Subathra
    Hebbar, Sudarshan
    Sickan, Jaganathan
    Schodin, Beth A.
    Sumpaico, Walfrido W.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 128 (02) : 239 - 244
  • [5] Human Epididymis Protein 4 (HE4) as a Serum Tumor Biomarker in Patients With Ovarian Carcinoma
    Chang, Xiaohong
    Ye, Xue
    Dong, Li
    Cheng, Hongyan
    Cheng, Yexia
    Zhu, Lirong
    Liao, Qinping
    Zhao, Yang
    Tian, Li
    Fu, Tianyun
    Chen, Jun
    Cui, Heng
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2011, 21 (05) : 852 - 858
  • [6] Evaluation of biomarker panels for early stage ovarian cancer detection and monitoring for disease recurrence
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Whitehead, Clark M.
    Rubatt, Jennifer M.
    Cheek, Robert L.
    Groelke, John
    He, Qin
    Malinowski, Douglas P.
    Fischer, Timothy J.
    Berchuck, Andrew
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 110 (03) : 374 - 382
  • [7] Ovarian cancer
    Hennessy, Bryan T.
    Coleman, Robert L.
    Markman, Maurie
    [J]. LANCET, 2009, 374 (9698) : 1371 - 1382
  • [8] Human epididymis protein 4 offers superior specificity in the differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopausal women
    Holcomb, Kevin
    Vucetic, Zivjena
    Miller, Craig
    Knapp, Robert C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 205 (04) : 358.e1 - 358.e6
  • [9] Serum HE4 concentration differentiates malignant ovarian tumours from ovarian endometriotic cysts
    Huhtinen, K.
    Suvitie, P.
    Hiissa, J.
    Junnila, J.
    Huvila, J.
    Kujari, H.
    Setala, M.
    Harkki, P.
    Jalkanen, J.
    Fraser, J.
    Makinen, J.
    Auranen, A.
    Poutanen, M.
    Perheentupa, A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 100 (08) : 1315 - 1319
  • [10] Diagnostic Value of Human Epididymis Protein 4 Compared with Mesothelin for Ovarian Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Lin, Jia-Ying
    Qin, Jin-Bao
    Li, Xiao-Yan
    Dong, Ping
    Yin, Bing-De
    [J]. ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2012, 13 (11) : 5427 - 5432