Mining maximum consensus sequences from group ranking data

被引:36
作者
Chen, Yen-Liang [1 ]
Cheng, Li-Chen [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cent Univ, Dept Informat Management, Chungli 320, Taiwan
[2] Soochow Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Informat Management, Taipei 100, Taiwan
关键词
Data mining; Decision making; Group decision making; Maximum consensus sequence; PARTIAL ORDINAL RANKINGS; PREFERENCE STRUCTURES; DECISION; AGGREGATION; PROPOSALS; DISTANCES; REVIEWERS; SET;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2008.09.004
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In the last decade, the problem of getting a consensus group ranking from all users' ranking data has received increased attention due to its widespread applications. Previous research solved this problem by consolidating the opinions of all users, thereby obtaining an ordering list of all items that represent the achieved consensus. The weakness of this approach, however, is that it always produces a ranking list of all items, regardless of how many conflicts exist among users. This work rejects the forced agreement of all items. Instead, we define a new concept, maximum consensus sequences, which are the longest ranking lists of items that agree with the majority and disagree only with the minority. Based on this concept, algorithm MCS is developed to determine the maximum consensus sequences from users' ranking data, and also to identify conflict items that need further negotiation. Extensive experiments are carried out using synthetic data sets, and the results indicate that the proposed method is computationally efficient. Finally, we discuss how the identified consensus sequences and conflict items information can be used in practice. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 251
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1955, RANK CORRELATION MET
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 5 INT C EXT DAT TE
[3]  
Antonie S, 1997, DECISION SCI, V28, P655
[4]  
BARTHOLDI J, 1989, SOC CHOICE WELFARE, V6, P57
[5]   Soft computing techniques for rank aggregation on the World Wide Web [J].
Beg, MMS ;
Ahmad, N .
WORLD WIDE WEB-INTERNET AND WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2003, 6 (01) :5-22
[6]   PREFERENCE STRUCTURES .1. DISTANCES BETWEEN TRANSITIVE PREFERENCE RELATIONS [J].
BOGART, KP .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, 1973, 3 (01) :49-67
[7]   PREFERENCE STRUCTURES .2. DISTANCES BETWEEN ASYMMETRIC RELATIONS [J].
BOGART, KP .
SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1975, 29 (02) :254-262
[8]  
Borda J., 1981, MEMOIRE ELECTIONS SC
[9]  
COHEN W, 1999, J ARTIFICIAL INTELLI, V10, P43
[10]  
Cook W., 1996, European Journal of Operational Research, V92, P392