Spatial characterization of non-material values across multiple coastal production landscapes in the Indian Sundarban delta

被引:20
作者
Dasgupta, Rajarshi [1 ]
Hashimoto, Shizuka [1 ,2 ]
Basu, Mrittika [3 ]
Okuro, Toshiya [2 ]
Johnson, Brian Alan [1 ]
Kumar, Pankaj [1 ]
Dhyani, Shalini [4 ]
机构
[1] Inst Global Environm Strategies, Nat Resources & Ecosyst Serv, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan
[2] Univ Tokyo, Dept Ecosyst Studies, Lab Landscape Ecol & Planning, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Global Environm Studies, Lab Sustainable Rural Dev, Kyoto, Japan
[4] CSIR Natl Environm Engn Res Inst NEERI, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
关键词
UNESCO world heritage; Mangroves; Hot-spot analysis; Nature's contribution to people (NCP); PPGIS;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-020-00899-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The paper narrates an empirical study of participatory mapping and spatial characterization of six non-material landscape values across multiple coastal production landscapes in the Indian Sundarban delta. The methodology relies on an inexpensive rapid rural appraisal technique that integrates the conventional notion of place preference and participatory mapping. 168 respondents living in the study area were provided six georeferenced maps with 30 pre-identified landmarks, and were asked to mark and rank at least three preferred locations (with no upper limit) for each of the six non-material landscape values category (i.e. spiritual, recreational, heritage, aesthetic, educational, and negative values). A total of 65 locations, depicting all the six landscape values, were identified from the survey. Corresponding scores against these points were calculated by multiplying the frequency of occurrence and assigned preference weights. We thereafter conducted a series of statistical and spatial analysis to understand the demographic patterns in the observed intangible values and their spatial association with different production landscapes. Regression modeling revealed significant influence of the age and educational profile of the respondents on the number of points marked viz.-a-viz. appreciation for non-material landscape values. Also, the Spearman correlation revealed a strong positive pairwise association between recreational and aesthetic values, spiritual and heritage as well as educational and heritage values. Finally, we computed landscape-wise availability of non-material values using a recent land use map of the delta, and found that agriculture/cultivated areas, rural settlements, and mudflats/beaches were associated with high non-material values, while aquaculture was minimally attributed to non-material landscape values. As such, the study facilitates a comparative understanding of non-material benefits from multiple rural production landscapes/waterscapes, besides providing valuable spatial information for policy-planners and administrative officials.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 738
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [31] Methods and participatory approaches for identifying social-ecological hotspots
    Karimi, Azadeh
    Brown, Greg
    Hockings, Marc
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2015, 63 : 9 - 20
  • [32] Kasiki, 2017, ORYX, V51, P75, DOI [10.1016/j.jnc.2017.03.002, DOI 10.1016/J.JNC.2017.03.002]
  • [33] Navigating coastal values: Participatory mapping of ecosystem services for spatial planning
    Klain, Sarah C.
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 82 : 104 - 113
  • [34] Protected Areas, Country and Value: The Nature-Culture Tyranny of the IUCN's Protected Area Guidelines for Indigenous Australians
    Lee, Emma
    [J]. ANTIPODE, 2016, 48 (02) : 355 - 374
  • [35] Mistri A, 2020, ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, LIVELIHOOD ISSUES AND MIGRATION: SUNDARBAN BIOSPHERE RESERVE, INDIA, P41, DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-8735-7_3
  • [36] Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach
    Pascual, Unai
    Balvanera, Patricia
    Diaz, Sandra
    Pataki, Gyorgy
    Roth, Eva
    Stenseke, Marie
    Watson, Robert T.
    Dessane, Esra Basak
    Islar, Mine
    Kelemen, Eszter
    Maris, Virginie
    Quaas, Martin
    Subramanian, Suneetha M.
    Wittmer, Heidi
    Adlan, Asia
    Ahn, Soeun
    Al-Hafedh, Yousef S.
    Amankwah, Edward
    Asah, Stanley T.
    Berry, Pam
    Bilgin, Adem
    Breslow, Sara J.
    Bullock, Craig
    Caceres, Daniel
    Daly-Hassen, Hamed
    Figueroa, Eugenio
    Golden, Christopher D.
    Gomez-Baggethun, Erik
    Gonzalez-Jimenez, David
    Houdet, Joel
    Keune, Hans
    Kumar, Ritesh
    Ma, Keping
    May, Peter H.
    Mead, Aroha
    O'Farrell, Patrick
    Pandit, Ram
    Pengue, Walter
    Pichis-Madruga, Ramon
    Popa, Florin
    Preston, Susan
    Pacheco-Balanza, Diego
    Saarikoski, Heli
    Strassburg, Bernardo B.
    van den Belt, Marjan
    Verma, Madhu
    Wickson, Fern
    Yagi, Noboyuki
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 26-27 : 7 - 16
  • [37] Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level
    Plieninger, Tobias
    Dijks, Sebastian
    Oteros-Rozas, Elisa
    Bieling, Claudia
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 33 : 118 - 129
  • [38] Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services
    Raymond, Christopher M.
    Bryan, Brett A.
    MacDonald, Darla Hatton
    Cast, Andrea
    Strathearn, Sarah
    Grandgirard, Agnes
    Kalivas, Tina
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (05) : 1301 - 1315
  • [39] The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services
    Ridding, Lucy E.
    Redhead, John W.
    Oliver, Tom H.
    Schmucki, Reto
    McGinlay, James
    Graves, Anil R.
    Morris, Joe
    Bradbury, Richard B.
    King, Helen
    Bullock, James M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 206 : 1145 - 1154
  • [40] Place attachment, identification and environment perception: An empirical study
    Rollero, Chiara
    De Piccoli, Norma
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 30 (02) : 198 - 205